The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
...Lampard fixed it =P
Page:
Gerrard did get into the premiership team of the season ahead of Lampard though.
With 59 views on the topic I reckon just about everyone on he sport forum have seen it anyway! :-)
I've changed it to save further embarrasment to myself and...well, myself again. :-/
=D
=D
Stu you dummy...
Frank Lampard came 2nd and Gerrard came 3rd
*shakes head* :P
Frank Lampard came 2nd and Gerrard came 3rd
*shakes head* :P
But I read Gerrard! And I waited to confirm this until I read it.
*Scowers the internet*
*Scowers the internet*
Virtuoso wrote:
> ...Gerrard got second place, beating Lampard in terms of positioning
> and greatness.
Ahaha. Lampard got second, so it was you who was 'wrong'.
> ...Gerrard got second place, beating Lampard in terms of positioning
> and greatness.
Ahaha. Lampard got second, so it was you who was 'wrong'.
Silent Scope wrote:
> Parker won it you fool.. what about toure?! He's only 23!
I know he did, thats why im saying it was rightful that either he or Wright-Phillips won it. You're right about Toure, he has been overlooked playing superbly alongside Sol Campbell this season.
> Parker won it you fool.. what about toure?! He's only 23!
I know he did, thats why im saying it was rightful that either he or Wright-Phillips won it. You're right about Toure, he has been overlooked playing superbly alongside Sol Campbell this season.
Virtuoso wrote:
> ...Gerrard got second place, beating Lampard in terms of positioning
> and greatness.
Oh, and this is wrong, it was Lampard second, Gerrard third. So i'm afraid you look slightly foolish now. Never mind.
> ...Gerrard got second place, beating Lampard in terms of positioning
> and greatness.
Oh, and this is wrong, it was Lampard second, Gerrard third. So i'm afraid you look slightly foolish now. Never mind.
Parker won it you fool.. what about toure?! He's only 23!
Ashley wrote:
> er are you sure? everywhere ive seen says lampard came second!
>
> Terry should have been YPOTS.
Nah, should have been Parker or Wright-Phillips, although it was extremely close between the names. I wouldn't consider Terry, that young, he is 24.
> er are you sure? everywhere ive seen says lampard came second!
>
> Terry should have been YPOTS.
Nah, should have been Parker or Wright-Phillips, although it was extremely close between the names. I wouldn't consider Terry, that young, he is 24.
Page: