The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Here is another stupid review by ff.
Forest Fan
I rate this product 9/10
Reviewed on: 6/4/2004
See all my reviews
GRAND THEFT AUTO: SAN ANDREAS (RATED 18) - Reviewed by Forest Fan
Grand Theft Auto: Sand Andreas is currently due for release on October 22, 2004. Helicopters and improved 3-D graphics are the main changes due for the next game in the Grand theft Auto series.
****************he knew this how
Forest Fan
I rate this product 9/10
Reviewed on: 6/4/2004
See all my reviews
GRAND THEFT AUTO: SAN ANDREAS (RATED 18) - Reviewed by Forest Fan
Grand Theft Auto: Sand Andreas is currently due for release on October 22, 2004. Helicopters and improved 3-D graphics are the main changes due for the next game in the Grand theft Auto series.
****************he knew this how
Page:
Slice and FF are both spaztics.
slice wrote:
> Here is another stupid review by ff.
>
> Forest Fan
>
> I rate this product 9/10
>
> Reviewed on: 6/4/2004
>
> See all my reviews
>
>
>
> GRAND THEFT AUTO: SAN ANDREAS (RATED 18) - Reviewed by Forest Fan
> Grand Theft Auto: Sand Andreas is currently due for release on
> October 22, 2004. Helicopters and improved 3-D graphics are the main
> changes due for the next game in the Grand theft Auto series.
>
> ****************he knew this how
He's got special connections.
> Here is another stupid review by ff.
>
> Forest Fan
>
> I rate this product 9/10
>
> Reviewed on: 6/4/2004
>
> See all my reviews
>
>
>
> GRAND THEFT AUTO: SAN ANDREAS (RATED 18) - Reviewed by Forest Fan
> Grand Theft Auto: Sand Andreas is currently due for release on
> October 22, 2004. Helicopters and improved 3-D graphics are the main
> changes due for the next game in the Grand theft Auto series.
>
> ****************he knew this how
He's got special connections.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
>
> stop submitting them then you idiot. how can you 'review' a game
> that hasn't been released yet?
I already did.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
>
> stop submitting them then you idiot. how can you 'review' a game
> that hasn't been released yet?
I already did.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
stop submitting them then you idiot. how can you 'review' a game that hasn't been released yet?
> Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
stop submitting them then you idiot. how can you 'review' a game that hasn't been released yet?
As am i.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> Forest Fan, yours are NOT reviews, they are a brief, extremely
> early and therefore unreliable synopsis, complete with an unconfirmed
> release date.
>
> they should be deleted, as should you for spamming SR's review
> database with completely useless information.
Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
> Forest Fan, yours are NOT reviews, they are a brief, extremely
> early and therefore unreliable synopsis, complete with an unconfirmed
> release date.
>
> they should be deleted, as should you for spamming SR's review
> database with completely useless information.
Get them deleted then, I'm all for them being deleted.
Do learn to use captial letters please, slice.
Forest Fan, yours are NOT reviews, they are a brief, extremely early and therefore unreliable synopsis, complete with an unconfirmed release date.
they should be deleted, as should you for spamming SR's review database with completely useless information.
they should be deleted, as should you for spamming SR's review database with completely useless information.
here are my best 3 reviews. in no particular order
Jak 2
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1057194448&specialid=71890[/URL]
conflict desert storm
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1029179370&specialid=71818[/URL]
sonic heroes
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1069162875&specialid=74174[/URL]
whos are better mine or ff's
Jak 2
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1057194448&specialid=71890[/URL]
conflict desert storm
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1029179370&specialid=71818[/URL]
sonic heroes
[URL]http://uk.special.reserve.co.uk/reviews/customer.php?index=1069162875&specialid=74174[/URL]
whos are better mine or ff's
Very_Metal wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> halo has to be the only good age on the x box but it still isnt
> worth
> buying an crappy x box why not just buy a ps2 it has more games on
> it
> any ways and the games from this gereaat website are cheap. even
> thogh they do x box games ai suggest buyin a ps2 i had an xbox
> because i used t be a prat then i sol it now im as happy as a
> beaver.
> by mubine din
>
> Slice's review of Halo.
>
> trust you of all people to select 'Halo' ;)
Interesting logic, like it. Didn't choose it for that, just knew I would click on a less then impressive review.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> halo has to be the only good age on the x box but it still isnt
> worth
> buying an crappy x box why not just buy a ps2 it has more games on
> it
> any ways and the games from this gereaat website are cheap. even
> thogh they do x box games ai suggest buyin a ps2 i had an xbox
> because i used t be a prat then i sol it now im as happy as a
> beaver.
> by mubine din
>
> Slice's review of Halo.
>
> trust you of all people to select 'Halo' ;)
Interesting logic, like it. Didn't choose it for that, just knew I would click on a less then impressive review.
Page: