The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
Yeah 100%
> Maybe, definetly, if its for cases like that and the police have got
> there right man. Use it for terorism??
Most terrorists seem quite willing to die as it is, hence not exactly going to make a difference is it ? As it is many terrorists are killed whilst being aprehended, and various organisations now have the freedom to 'remove' known terrorists given the chance - as the CIA has done in Afghanistan many a time.
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
Right on!
> Most terrorists seem quite willing to die as it is, hence not exactly
> going to make a difference is it ? As it is many terrorists are
> killed whilst being aprehended, and various organisations now have
> the freedom to 'remove' known terrorists given the chance - as the
> CIA has done in Afghanistan many a time.
Yeah there is a difference it stops them killing others agian.
> RoJ wrote:
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
>
> Right on!
Shut up, idiot.
> RoJ wrote:
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
>
> Right on!
Damn straight
> So you’re saying that a murderer has the right to take someone’s life
> and then has the right to live his life! Totally wrong. NO matter how
> much counselling they have it does not change the fact they have
> ended someone’s life.
I have to agree with the above statement. Having only recently found out that the actor Leslie Grantham was jailed for murder, I have found watching him in Eastenders very difficult. Here is a man with a successful career, getting on with life. Something his victim has been denied.