The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> RoJ wrote:
> Then 90% sure. If there is sufficient evidence then they should
> die.
> And those human rights people can die too, because they are one of
> my
> pet hates.
>
> Yeah ! Kill them all eh ?
Yeah!!!!!! Good to see you are on our side, Belldandy!!
Lock them away from society and put them to good use instead. Like on a treadmill or something.
> Then 90% sure. If there is sufficient evidence then they should die.
> And those human rights people can die too, because they are one of my
> pet hates.
Yeah ! Kill them all eh ?
Roj - you're sounding like just the type of person who justifies the existence of human rights groups.
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
But thats just it, you can never be 100% sure of a persons guilt. No justice system is perfect. At least if 10 years down the line new evidence comes to light proving someone is actually innocent they can be released to rebuild their lives. A dead person would find this quite difficult.
> So you’re saying that a murderer has the right to take someone’s life
> and then has the right to live his life! Totally wrong. NO matter how
> much counselling they have it does not change the fact they have
> ended someone’s life.
I have to agree with the above statement. Having only recently found out that the actor Leslie Grantham was jailed for murder, I have found watching him in Eastenders very difficult. Here is a man with a successful career, getting on with life. Something his victim has been denied.
> RoJ wrote:
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
>
> Right on!
Damn straight
> RoJ wrote:
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
>
> Right on!
Shut up, idiot.
> Most terrorists seem quite willing to die as it is, hence not exactly
> going to make a difference is it ? As it is many terrorists are
> killed whilst being aprehended, and various organisations now have
> the freedom to 'remove' known terrorists given the chance - as the
> CIA has done in Afghanistan many a time.
Yeah there is a difference it stops them killing others agian.
> I'm for the death penalty, as long as the criminal is definitely
> guilty.
Right on!