The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
So who do you want to be the next Pope?
I just wanted to use the title. Bet it's been done a thousand times before anyway
I just wanted to use the title. Bet it's been done a thousand times before anyway
Page:
Stryke wrote:
> No. You won't even answer my questions, let alone Lights. And whenever
> anyone else posts in a thread where we're trying to get answers, you
> decide you've had enough with the avoidance and try on your
> faux-flirting with anyone else who has posted in the topic.
Lord have mercy, I'm answering everything! It's just never good enough for you people, who just seemingly want my blood.
You keep saying I'm avoiding the questions...what question am I not answering for you to satisfaction?? What is it that I said to rile you up?? That you're bobble heads? Followers? Yes, you Stryke. What is you're position on the Christian Right movement? As if I care.. All I see is you nodding your head to Light's hypocritical sermon...and as the bully's strong-arm. You people can't be kind. You have too much unrest in you.
As I said yesterday, I'll be here until you have your last lashing. Because your wrong in singling me out and trying to discredit me for having opinions of my own. Just as with Light's persistent pummeling, I have methods of communication that are effective devices and I use them at will. I especially love my faux-flirting hat, because...well, being the hot babe as I am, it gets me the pretty. Don't be hatin'!
> No. You won't even answer my questions, let alone Lights. And whenever
> anyone else posts in a thread where we're trying to get answers, you
> decide you've had enough with the avoidance and try on your
> faux-flirting with anyone else who has posted in the topic.
Lord have mercy, I'm answering everything! It's just never good enough for you people, who just seemingly want my blood.
You keep saying I'm avoiding the questions...what question am I not answering for you to satisfaction?? What is it that I said to rile you up?? That you're bobble heads? Followers? Yes, you Stryke. What is you're position on the Christian Right movement? As if I care.. All I see is you nodding your head to Light's hypocritical sermon...and as the bully's strong-arm. You people can't be kind. You have too much unrest in you.
As I said yesterday, I'll be here until you have your last lashing. Because your wrong in singling me out and trying to discredit me for having opinions of my own. Just as with Light's persistent pummeling, I have methods of communication that are effective devices and I use them at will. I especially love my faux-flirting hat, because...well, being the hot babe as I am, it gets me the pretty. Don't be hatin'!
No. You won't even answer my questions, let alone Lights. And whenever anyone else posts in a thread where we're trying to get answers, you decide you've had enough with the avoidance and try on your faux-flirting with anyone else who has posted in the topic.
Stryke wrote:
> She won't have a clue why we're annoyed. It's always the same with our
> morally superior, self-appointed Christian guardians.
Buzz off Stryke.
> She won't have a clue why we're annoyed. It's always the same with our
> morally superior, self-appointed Christian guardians.
Buzz off Stryke.
She won't have a clue why we're annoyed. It's always the same with our morally superior, self-appointed Christian guardians.
Celestine wrote:
>
>
> Ah, so because I started it, you're free to say and do whatever you
> want, free of criticism from me? And because you just "riled
> them up", that's okay? Tell me, how is your riling of people
> any
> different to the hassle you're wailing about? And when you say you
> did it for fun, doesn't that make you as bad (if not worse) than
> what
> you're accusing me of doing?
>
>
> Do what you must to feel more of a man. Why you would continue this,
> however, is my concern. You'd keep kicking someone when they're
> already down? Turn around, apologise to their loved ones and then
> continue kicking them just for sh*ts and giggles? Nice, Light. Goes
> to maturity, really.
Again, a magnificent avoidance of accepting any responsibility for your words, and an attempt to put the onus back onto me. Are you intending to answer the question in the paragraph, or are you simply determined to avoid it?
Incidentally, I'd "continue like this" because you're being so evasive.
>
> Mr. Thraves would prefer to remain neutral, because reading any of
> this would drain him so. You are aware that he's not reading
> any of this right?
Isn't he? Can't say as I care my dear; I've apologised to him and made it clear that I don't apologise for taking you to task.
>
> You are really distressing me, Light. I am not strong, no matter
> what you preceive of me. I'm actually hanging on to every bit of
> faith that I've got in me. If you only knew how you're hurting me,
> how these tears have run down my face since your initial outburst.
If only I believed you, I'd empathise. However, as your general reaction to those disagreeing with you has been snide, insulting, and rather abusive, and as you've offered no apology for that (instead trying to justify it by saying it was for fun, as if you're exempt from the standards you seek to impose on others), you'll pardon me for not believing you one bit.
>
> He doesn't know either. I don't think he'd be very pleased to know.
> He told me there was no reason for me to apologise to you, but the
> more an more this persists I wonder..I don't know..what is it really
> that you want from me? To be sorry for being happy? I'm sorry then.
> Please forgive me. I promise not to be that here anymore. Just
> please stop..please stop. I only wanted to be your friend, not
> generate any of this. I know that you won't be that, so I only ask
> of you to leave me be, if you would please be so kind..?
Oh for fu...
Spare me your victimhood. No, I don't want you to apologise for being happy. I want you to explain why you have the views you do. Either that, or just don't respond. I can do without endless guilt tripping because I've had the temerity to ask questions of you. I'll admit, your tweeness irritates, but it does so because it disappears and is replaced with vitriol the second you feel you've been wronged.
> I wont give you anything more of me. I didn't treat anyone like
> this.
No. You did it for fun apparently. Tell me, if someone had reacted the way you are to your "fun", would it make you stop and think?
> I apologised for my initial outburst. Does that mean I'm not allowed
> to ask you questions? If not, why not?
>
>
> I don't understand why you're so interested in what I have to say.
The same reason I'm interested in anyone's views that differ from mine; I want to see the mental journey they took to get there.
>
>
> View it as you wish. Are you of the Clergy? I'm not. Hence, my
> ability to explain it in laymens terms.
Are YOU of the clergy? If not, why make the point of saying it's in laymens terms?
>
>
> I'm not the one complaining here. And I am putting up the best I
> can. I know it's not what you expected. This is not what I
> expected. I actually had not expectations, but for this to
> happen..it's just quite shocking coming from people I had such
> admiration for.
Well...life's full of surprises, isn't it?
> I'm not evasive of anything, except for my ex...but, that's a
> different story. My opinions stem from my education and experience.
> I don't like debating with people who do nothing but condescend me
> personally. It's a worthless endeavor for you. There's only one
> step left for me, you see, and that would be off a ledge. I'm not
> taking it because of you.
Wow. So although you've been condescending to others, you feel a quick "*HUG*!!!" and all is well? Just because you don't feel you've been condescending, it doesn't follow that others feel the same.
And more guilt tripping I see...I'm driving you to suicide? Course I am...Jesus, do you guilt trip men into not dmuping you cos you'll kill yourself?
If talking to me upsets you so much, then by all means stop talking to me. I'll get through the say somehow if you do.
> Please don't be angry. I'll take responsibility for everything, if
> this would end?
Which is not what I'm asking. Do you even know what you've said that has riled up Styke? Or myself?
>
> If I can recall, I labeled you a hypocrite because you'd stand your
> ground there and argue with that Kevstar person about being
> prejudice, yet rant off in a generalising fashion about a people and
> their beliefs. You seem to have had no other motive other than
> wanting to rant. Which remains demeaning of you and
> your character, even with ranting on about me and my Catholic faith.
> Nothing you said really made a solid point, other than you thinking
> they're bad and rambling on and on about how you don't like them.
> It's just how I viewed it all. It's just my opinion and your need to
> "quantify" it, I guess should be flattering. But, it's
> really lost it's gloss already.
Well guess what; that's what opinions are. Me saying what I think. I'm prejudiced against evangelists? Yup. I'm also prejudiced against Nazi's. I'm prejudiced against all manner of totalitarians. You seem to be saying that people shouldn't have opinions, or if they do then they shouldn't have to put any thought into them.
As to being a generalised attack, did you feel I wasn't being specific enough in attacking the movement known as "the christian right"? If not, how could I have been more specific. As is, I was talking about the Evangelical Christian Right who use the Bible to justify extremely unchristian beliefs and actions, and why they denigrate Christians who act in a manner becoming of followers of Christ. But if that wasn't clear enough then clearly I need to work on what I said.
Anyway, thank you for responding to my query about why you felt I was a hypocrite.
>
>
> Ah, so because I started it, you're free to say and do whatever you
> want, free of criticism from me? And because you just "riled
> them up", that's okay? Tell me, how is your riling of people
> any
> different to the hassle you're wailing about? And when you say you
> did it for fun, doesn't that make you as bad (if not worse) than
> what
> you're accusing me of doing?
>
>
> Do what you must to feel more of a man. Why you would continue this,
> however, is my concern. You'd keep kicking someone when they're
> already down? Turn around, apologise to their loved ones and then
> continue kicking them just for sh*ts and giggles? Nice, Light. Goes
> to maturity, really.
Again, a magnificent avoidance of accepting any responsibility for your words, and an attempt to put the onus back onto me. Are you intending to answer the question in the paragraph, or are you simply determined to avoid it?
Incidentally, I'd "continue like this" because you're being so evasive.
>
> Mr. Thraves would prefer to remain neutral, because reading any of
> this would drain him so. You are aware that he's not reading
> any of this right?
Isn't he? Can't say as I care my dear; I've apologised to him and made it clear that I don't apologise for taking you to task.
>
> You are really distressing me, Light. I am not strong, no matter
> what you preceive of me. I'm actually hanging on to every bit of
> faith that I've got in me. If you only knew how you're hurting me,
> how these tears have run down my face since your initial outburst.
If only I believed you, I'd empathise. However, as your general reaction to those disagreeing with you has been snide, insulting, and rather abusive, and as you've offered no apology for that (instead trying to justify it by saying it was for fun, as if you're exempt from the standards you seek to impose on others), you'll pardon me for not believing you one bit.
>
> He doesn't know either. I don't think he'd be very pleased to know.
> He told me there was no reason for me to apologise to you, but the
> more an more this persists I wonder..I don't know..what is it really
> that you want from me? To be sorry for being happy? I'm sorry then.
> Please forgive me. I promise not to be that here anymore. Just
> please stop..please stop. I only wanted to be your friend, not
> generate any of this. I know that you won't be that, so I only ask
> of you to leave me be, if you would please be so kind..?
Oh for fu...
Spare me your victimhood. No, I don't want you to apologise for being happy. I want you to explain why you have the views you do. Either that, or just don't respond. I can do without endless guilt tripping because I've had the temerity to ask questions of you. I'll admit, your tweeness irritates, but it does so because it disappears and is replaced with vitriol the second you feel you've been wronged.
> I wont give you anything more of me. I didn't treat anyone like
> this.
No. You did it for fun apparently. Tell me, if someone had reacted the way you are to your "fun", would it make you stop and think?
> I apologised for my initial outburst. Does that mean I'm not allowed
> to ask you questions? If not, why not?
>
>
> I don't understand why you're so interested in what I have to say.
The same reason I'm interested in anyone's views that differ from mine; I want to see the mental journey they took to get there.
>
>
> View it as you wish. Are you of the Clergy? I'm not. Hence, my
> ability to explain it in laymens terms.
Are YOU of the clergy? If not, why make the point of saying it's in laymens terms?
>
>
> I'm not the one complaining here. And I am putting up the best I
> can. I know it's not what you expected. This is not what I
> expected. I actually had not expectations, but for this to
> happen..it's just quite shocking coming from people I had such
> admiration for.
Well...life's full of surprises, isn't it?
> I'm not evasive of anything, except for my ex...but, that's a
> different story. My opinions stem from my education and experience.
> I don't like debating with people who do nothing but condescend me
> personally. It's a worthless endeavor for you. There's only one
> step left for me, you see, and that would be off a ledge. I'm not
> taking it because of you.
Wow. So although you've been condescending to others, you feel a quick "*HUG*!!!" and all is well? Just because you don't feel you've been condescending, it doesn't follow that others feel the same.
And more guilt tripping I see...I'm driving you to suicide? Course I am...Jesus, do you guilt trip men into not dmuping you cos you'll kill yourself?
If talking to me upsets you so much, then by all means stop talking to me. I'll get through the say somehow if you do.
> Please don't be angry. I'll take responsibility for everything, if
> this would end?
Which is not what I'm asking. Do you even know what you've said that has riled up Styke? Or myself?
>
> If I can recall, I labeled you a hypocrite because you'd stand your
> ground there and argue with that Kevstar person about being
> prejudice, yet rant off in a generalising fashion about a people and
> their beliefs. You seem to have had no other motive other than
> wanting to rant. Which remains demeaning of you and
> your character, even with ranting on about me and my Catholic faith.
> Nothing you said really made a solid point, other than you thinking
> they're bad and rambling on and on about how you don't like them.
> It's just how I viewed it all. It's just my opinion and your need to
> "quantify" it, I guess should be flattering. But, it's
> really lost it's gloss already.
Well guess what; that's what opinions are. Me saying what I think. I'm prejudiced against evangelists? Yup. I'm also prejudiced against Nazi's. I'm prejudiced against all manner of totalitarians. You seem to be saying that people shouldn't have opinions, or if they do then they shouldn't have to put any thought into them.
As to being a generalised attack, did you feel I wasn't being specific enough in attacking the movement known as "the christian right"? If not, how could I have been more specific. As is, I was talking about the Evangelical Christian Right who use the Bible to justify extremely unchristian beliefs and actions, and why they denigrate Christians who act in a manner becoming of followers of Christ. But if that wasn't clear enough then clearly I need to work on what I said.
Anyway, thank you for responding to my query about why you felt I was a hypocrite.
Oh sweet mercy, shes a lessie
Lou Bega wrote:
> I vote COng_Man for poop
A little bit of Lou makes me your man ;-)
> I vote COng_Man for poop
A little bit of Lou makes me your man ;-)
Which reminds me... I gotta poop
I vote COng_Man for poop
Vote Cong Man! For Pope!
:->
:->
Page: