Viewing Thread:
"Pope Idol"

So who do you want to be the next Pope?

I just wanted to use the title. Bet it's been done a thousand times before anyway

Yes being a slug I dont like the light. Or is it that I do like it? I never remember. Also its Slurms ya hippo

Careful there Slurg..err, Slurms.. I fear Light will be back with more fury.

Bloody Mary

Light wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Light wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Light wrote:
>
> And yet, you're happy to condemn others? Sorry sweetheart, but if
> you're gonna dish it out, learn to take it.
>
> Jesus, Mary, and Joseph..what are you blabbing about now, you. I
> didn't start this you remember? You lashed out at me. I went to
> your Christian Warriors (whatever) thread and had my fun and now
> you're all pissy because I called your rant crap. I didn't condemn
> anyone for anything, I just riled them up referring to them as a
> congregation of bobble-heads. It was for fun. You know, haha? I
> subsequently mentioned that I share the some of the same views as
> you, but you just want to argue.
>
>
> Ah, so because I started it, you're free to say and do whatever you
> want, free of criticism from me? And because you just "riled
> them up", that's okay? Tell me, how is your riling of people any
> different to the hassle you're wailing about? And when you say you
> did it for fun, doesn't that make you as bad (if not worse) than what
> you're accusing me of doing?
>

Do what you must to feel more of a man. Why you would continue this, however, is my concern. You'd keep kicking someone when they're already down? Turn around, apologise to their loved ones and then continue kicking them just for sh*ts and giggles? Nice, Light. Goes to maturity, really.

Mr. Thraves would prefer to remain neutral, because reading any of this would drain him so. You are aware that he's not reading any of this right?

You are really distressing me, Light. I am not strong, no matter what you preceive of me. I'm actually hanging on to every bit of faith that I've got in me. If you only knew how you're hurting me, how these tears have run down my face since your initial outburst.

He doesn't know either. I don't think he'd be very pleased to know. He told me there was no reason for me to apologise to you, but the more an more this persists I wonder..I don't know..what is it really that you want from me? To be sorry for being happy? I'm sorry then. Please forgive me. I promise not to be that here anymore. Just please stop..please stop. I only wanted to be your friend, not generate any of this. I know that you won't be that, so I only ask of you to leave me be, if you would please be so kind..?

> By the way, I'm still waiting for your comments on the rant that you
> promised. You're welcome to criticise it, but thus far all you've
> done is said "It's hypocritical", and refused to elaborate.
> Care to do so, or are you just going to sit there and cry whenever
> anyone treats you in the way you've treated others?
>

I wont give you anything more of me, (edit) at the moment. I didn't treat anyone like this.

> You apologised to me. Do you not recall? I accepted
> your apology. Were you not sincere? I have to ask, because
> you keep wanting me to "take it" from you. I'll keep
> dishing it back if you want to keep dancing in circles and trying to
> make me out to be something I'm not.
>
>
> I apologised for my initial outburst. Does that mean I'm not allowed
> to ask you questions? If not, why not?
>

I don't understand why you're so interested in what I have to say.

>
> I don't think I'm better than anyone because I'm Catholic. I'm not
> perfect and I don't think I know it all. But, if you insist on
> categorising me as such, so be it. I can't control what you think,
> only defend my position.
>
> Well, when you castigate people for their lack of faith, and tell
> them that you'll explain things "In laymans terms", it does
> rather sound like you think you're better than them, does it not?
>
>

View it as you wish. Are you of the Clergy? I'm not. Hence, my ability to explain it in laymens terms.

>
>
> Bleh. I know I'm not special to you. I don't want to be either.
> Ew! You're seeming to me like the lion in the Wizard of Oz now.
> "Come ooonn, puttum aaappp..." Puhlease. I'll give it to
> you when I'm damn ready.
>
>
> And in the meantime, you'll complain about having to do so? Either
> put up or shut up my dear. Quit your whining; it's demeaning to you.
>
>

I'm not the one complaining here. And I am putting up the best I can. I know it's not what you expected. This is not what I expected. I actually had not expectations, but for this to happen..it's just quite shocking coming from people I had such admiration for.

>
> *looks around* Who's angry? You seem angrier than anyone I've
> encountered here on these forums. What gives? Is it because I'm
> not
> standing down? Is it because I'm a woman? Is it because I'm
> Catholic? Please do disclose. What is it that makes you so
> distressed with me, love?
>
> Who's angry? Mwahahahahahahaaaa! Why, you are. You know; the person
> who is complaining and bitching at being asked questions?
>
> Is it because you're a women? No, but I'm interested to see that you
> try and raise misogyny as a defence. Says a lot about you. I'm asking
> you to explain where your opinions stem from. That you're evasive
> about it is not my problem.

I'm not evasive of anything, except for my ex...but, that's a different story. My opinions stem from my education and experience. I don't like debating with people who do nothing but condescend me personally. It's a worthless endeavor for you. There's only one step left for me, you see, and that would be off a ledge. I'm not taking it because of you.

>
> And why do you anger me? Because you see fit to "rile everyone
> up", then try and duck out of taking any responsibility for your
> words and wailing about it. Simple really.
>
>

Please don't be angry. I'll take responsibility for everything, if this would end?

> It's not the questions, I don't mind proper inquiries...just your
> demeanor.
>
> Well, we can't please all of the people all of the time. These
> are proper inquiries. The "tone" of the words on the
> page is irrelevant to what your answers will be.
>
>
>
> I must be that arousing?
>
> If you have a decent set of sweater cows, doubtless you would be. As
> is, you're a set of opinions that I'd like you to quantify.

That made me laugh. What are sweater cows? Whenever I'm done with defending myself here, I'll get around to taking another look at your essay on the Christian Right movement in America.

If I can recall, I labeled you a hypocrite because you'd stand your ground there and argue with that Kevstar person about being prejudice, yet rant off in a generalising fashion about a people and their beliefs. You seem to have had no other motive other than wanting to rant. Which remains demeaning of you and your character, even with ranting on about me and my Catholic faith. Nothing you said really made a solid point, other than you thinking they're bad and rambling on and on about how you don't like them. It's just how I viewed it all. It's just my opinion and your need to "quantify" it, I guess should be flattering. But, it's really lost it's gloss already.

I also had a PopEye Doll when I was a wee lad.

Release the hounds

I joyned Pop Idol, series 1 and got true to de second stage but then they realised that I couldnt sing and decided to lose me.

Celestine wrote:
> Light wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Light wrote:

> And yet, you're happy to condemn others? Sorry sweetheart, but if
> you're gonna dish it out, learn to take it.
>
> Jesus, Mary, and Joseph..what are you blabbing about now, you. I
> didn't start this you remember? You lashed out at me. I went to
> your Christian Warriors (whatever) thread and had my fun and now
> you're all pissy because I called your rant crap. I didn't condemn
> anyone for anything, I just riled them up referring to them as a
> congregation of bobble-heads. It was for fun. You know, haha? I
> subsequently mentioned that I share the some of the same views as
> you, but you just want to argue.
>

Ah, so because I started it, you're free to say and do whatever you want, free of criticism from me? And because you just "riled them up", that's okay? Tell me, how is your riling of people any different to the hassle you're wailing about? And when you say you did it for fun, doesn't that make you as bad (if not worse) than what you're accusing me of doing?

By the way, I'm still waiting for your comments on the rant that you promised. You're welcome to criticise it, but thus far all you've done is said "It's hypocritical", and refused to elaborate. Care to do so, or are you just going to sit there and cry whenever anyone treats you in the way you've treated others?

> You apologised to me. Do you not recall? I accepted
> your apology. Were you not sincere? I have to ask, because
> you keep wanting me to "take it" from you. I'll keep
> dishing it back if you want to keep dancing in circles and trying to
> make me out to be something I'm not.


I apologised for my initial outburst. Does that mean I'm not allowed to ask you questions? If not, why not?

>
> I don't think I'm better than anyone because I'm Catholic. I'm not
> perfect and I don't think I know it all. But, if you insist on
> categorising me as such, so be it. I can't control what you think,
> only defend my position.

Well, when you castigate people for their lack of faith, and tell them that you'll explain things "In laymans terms", it does rather sound like you think you're better than them, does it not?

>

>
> Bleh. I know I'm not special to you. I don't want to be either.
> Ew! You're seeming to me like the lion in the Wizard of Oz now.
> "Come ooonn, puttum aaappp..." Puhlease. I'll give it to
> you when I'm damn ready.


And in the meantime, you'll complain about having to do so? Either put up or shut up my dear. Quit your whining; it's demeaning to you.


>
> *looks around* Who's angry? You seem angrier than anyone I've
> encountered here on these forums. What gives? Is it because I'm not
> standing down? Is it because I'm a woman? Is it because I'm
> Catholic? Please do disclose. What is it that makes you so
> distressed with me, love?

Who's angry? Mwahahahahahahaaaa! Why, you are. You know; the person who is complaining and bitching at being asked questions?

Is it because you're a women? No, but I'm interested to see that you try and raise misogyny as a defence. Says a lot about you. I'm asking you to explain where your opinions stem from. That you're evasive about it is not my problem.

And why do you anger me? Because you see fit to "rile everyone up", then try and duck out of taking any responsibility for your words and wailing about it. Simple really.


> It's not the questions, I don't mind proper inquiries...just your
> demeanor.

Well, we can't please all of the people all of the time. These are proper inquiries. The "tone" of the words on the page is irrelevant to what your answers will be.


>
> I must be that arousing?

If you have a decent set of sweater cows, doubtless you would be. As is, you're a set of opinions that I'd like you to quantify.

Kenan, tis because you are teh condescendation.

Don't try to make Lightsir seem like teh out of line guy by bringing your alltoobvious sexuality into teh equation.

Tis like responding to a Palace fan, "WHAT? I spit on you!" *shotgun* "I must be right because I touch myself at night"

mattributé wrote:
> [URL]http://img190.exs.cx/img190/6144/buddlep1ue.jpg[/URL]
>
> Obv.

I knew you'd use that as soon as I sent it to you, hove.