The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
My 2.8 P4 will only hit 230 fsb ~ 3.2GHz , but I've got RAM capable of hitting ~277 fsb.
I know it means spending more money, but it keeps me happy and therefore worth it...
I want to replace it with either a 15 multiplier (3.0 GHz) or a 13 multiplier (2.6 GHz).
The 2.6 has advantage of being renowned for bad boy overclocks in the region of 1GHz and the bandwidth that would come with such an overclock would be awesome.
The 3.0 has the advantage of being able to achieve close to 4GHz but with limited bandwidth, the prices of both chips are fairly low.
Any thoughts on the better OC path to go down??
[URL]http://www.cpudatabase.com/CPUdb/[/URL]
> Here's your challenge: to become the king of SL6Z5 overclocers, beat
> 3.8 GHz on 1.60 Volts. It's been done. Abit IC7, watercooled.
>
...where did you see that?? It would be interesting to see what kind of RAM temps etc..
Here's your challenge: to become the king of SL6Z5 overclocers, beat 3.8 GHz on 1.60 Volts. It's been done. Abit IC7, watercooled.
Allegedly the best O/C on one is 4191 MHz, 1.71 Volts, watercooled, on a modded P4P800.
Go tig!
> Yep... never had thermal paste on it either. :-)
I just checked my Motherboard, and it doesn't support 800Mhz FSBs. Shame, otherwise I would have probably gone for it.
> Well how does £65.00 sound + brand new Intel heatsink?
Pritty good. What version, the 800Mhz FSB?