Viewing Thread:
"Under Siege 2"

Who watched it last night? It's an absolute classic. We need more films like that, there are to many films that try and make you think these days.

Cyclone wrote:
> That girl had nice breasts.
*****

Had her.

Under Siege had Tommy Lee Jones in it.

He was ruined even more.

That girl had nice breasts.

THERE WAS A SECOND?!!

Quality.

This was brilliant.

The plot was awful, really bad and a total rip off of loads of films from the past.

There was no acting.

There was the obligatory unfunny funny black man.

There was excruciating special effects.

There was gory slapstick fights.

There was a train crash.

There was a stealth bomber.

There was the impeccable black suit.

Don't you get it?! Stephen Segal was unwittingly starring in a parody. His thinking it was serious was what put it above Scream in the spoof stakes.

You people just don't get it - it's TOO good to be good. It's so bad that it is, in fact, amazing.

"T!ts to die for..."

Classic lines like that make it a classic flick.

Utter shiite.

Under Siege 2 a classic? My ar$e!

I rank Stephen Segal on a same level as van Damme. 2 Actors that make me want to rip my eyes out everytime I see their films, truely awful.

I love all his movies, apart from some of his newer ones like Time to Kill (or whatever the hell is was called), I enjoyed Exit Wounds though.

Terrible movie, in fact, beyond terrible it's so bad that until now I had successfully removed it from my memory. Pretty much any film with Steven “Leather Face” Segal is bad, but this is truly one of his worse efforts (I use the word "effort" lightly, since Segal never seems to make any effort at anything he'd call Acting.)

Steven Seagal can't act.

I've seen it before, though. I only saw the last 10 minutes last night, and I only left that on because Katherine Heigl is fit.