The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think yes because the rights of women have been improved whereas before they were badly treated.
Page:
There's an immense problem with the media talking about Iraq.
As the Scottish Sun Newspaper said, "They only show you the bad parts of Iraq. They don't show you the parts where people are enjoying the first bit of goodness", or something.
As the Scottish Sun Newspaper said, "They only show you the bad parts of Iraq. They don't show you the parts where people are enjoying the first bit of goodness", or something.
Skarra wrote:
> 2113 wrote:
> America invaded Iraq to make s**t safer for the people. America has
> made
> s**t worse.
>
> Thats just a generalisation based on a few news reports. Yes, the
> s**tuation appears to be going to s*s**t, but s**t isn't The vast majors**ty
> of Iraq is much better than s**t was under Saddam.
True, at least not so many innocent women and children are being killed. Before just anyone was killed. People are dying but not like they use to.
> 2113 wrote:
> America invaded Iraq to make s**t safer for the people. America has
> made
> s**t worse.
>
> Thats just a generalisation based on a few news reports. Yes, the
> s**tuation appears to be going to s*s**t, but s**t isn't The vast majors**ty
> of Iraq is much better than s**t was under Saddam.
True, at least not so many innocent women and children are being killed. Before just anyone was killed. People are dying but not like they use to.
Corvantis wrote:
> Iraq has the right to defend their country if they feel it is under
> threat as do all countries.
But you don't agree with their kidnapping Japanise aid workers? Do you? Agree with the occupation or not, they are just their to help.
> Iraq has the right to defend their country if they feel it is under
> threat as do all countries.
But you don't agree with their kidnapping Japanise aid workers? Do you? Agree with the occupation or not, they are just their to help.
2113 wrote:
> If Bush is horrible then Blair must be too he didn't exactly try to
> prevent the war did he!
But he spent months trying to get the UN to act on resolution 1441, the one justifing the war.
And what was he supposed to do? The intel in front of him, and the intel in the US, and France, and Germany, and any other country, all said Iraq had WMD. He couldn't sit there and say, 'i'm sure its wrong, even though it comes from 99% of the worlds inteligence sources'.
> If Bush is horrible then Blair must be too he didn't exactly try to
> prevent the war did he!
But he spent months trying to get the UN to act on resolution 1441, the one justifing the war.
And what was he supposed to do? The intel in front of him, and the intel in the US, and France, and Germany, and any other country, all said Iraq had WMD. He couldn't sit there and say, 'i'm sure its wrong, even though it comes from 99% of the worlds inteligence sources'.
2113 wrote:
> America invaded Iraq to make s**t safer for the people. America has made
> s**t worse.
Thats just a generalisation based on a few news reports. Yes, the s**tuation appears to be going to s*s**t, but s**t isn't The vast majors**ty of Iraq is much better than s**t was under Saddam.
> America invaded Iraq to make s**t safer for the people. America has made
> s**t worse.
Thats just a generalisation based on a few news reports. Yes, the s**tuation appears to be going to s*s**t, but s**t isn't The vast majors**ty of Iraq is much better than s**t was under Saddam.
But not the way they are currently.
Iraq has the right to defend their country if they feel it is under threat as do all countries.
2113 wrote:
> America invaded Iraq to make it safer for the people.
Yeah, *that's* why they invaded.
Interesting timing for the question - 'is Iraq better off under America's control' - on the very day the coalition admit they *don't* control many parts of Iraq (and have even withdrawn their troops).
> America invaded Iraq to make it safer for the people.
Yeah, *that's* why they invaded.
Interesting timing for the question - 'is Iraq better off under America's control' - on the very day the coalition admit they *don't* control many parts of Iraq (and have even withdrawn their troops).
There was a cause to the war, you know.
If Bush is horrible then Blair must be too he didn't exactly try to prevent the war did he!
Page: