The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This time round only, just due to snuggly's blatant advantage here.
I voted for timmargh, and its probably a wasted vote, for some one who under usual circumstances would be a front runner.
"One new "Notable" is elected every three months, in respect of their contribution to making UKchatforums.com a fun place to come and visit."
Snuggly blatantly makes the criteria why don't they just make him one anyway, same goes for most ex moderators as they have done this!
Personally i think second place (lets assume snuggly becomes the notable) should be made one as well, as there are people who should have the sacred urine stained name, and its a bit harsh to drop them down the pecking order when they make a valuable contribution anyway, because a staffie leaves.
I voted for timmargh, and its probably a wasted vote, for some one who under usual circumstances would be a front runner.
"One new "Notable" is elected every three months, in respect of their contribution to making UKchatforums.com a fun place to come and visit."
Snuggly blatantly makes the criteria why don't they just make him one anyway, same goes for most ex moderators as they have done this!
Personally i think second place (lets assume snuggly becomes the notable) should be made one as well, as there are people who should have the sacred urine stained name, and its a bit harsh to drop them down the pecking order when they make a valuable contribution anyway, because a staffie leaves.
i'm popping this cos paradox (presumably) should get it too
Isn't it funny he put off the election until after he quit (and therefore subject to notable status), when it was long overdue already?
disagree, he did a lot for us with regards to the site even if it was his job, there are alot of near silent staff, and got quite a bit of grief, he is valuable and should be automatically be one, due to different history with the site.
To be honest, I don't consider snuggly a valuable enough member to vote for.
Someone like Timmargh, Borat or Paradox really should get it - they contribute much more than Snuggly does, It's just that they didn't have the power to ban or spank like Snuggly did. We're voting for the wrong reasons here, that's all.
Someone like Timmargh, Borat or Paradox really should get it - they contribute much more than Snuggly does, It's just that they didn't have the power to ban or spank like Snuggly did. We're voting for the wrong reasons here, that's all.
it makes sense, obviously snuggly meets the criteria. If he's good enough to be employed then he meets there responsible good contribution criteria.
Should just have been made one immediately. so another deserving person actually gets the votes they would.
Should just have been made one immediately. so another deserving person actually gets the votes they would.
Yeah, Snuggly has already won it and we knew this ages ago.
It's like between 1938 and 45 in Germany, people still had the vote but there was only one party to vote for - The Nazis.
Democracy has been corrupted and Paradox isn't happy.
It's like between 1938 and 45 in Germany, people still had the vote but there was only one party to vote for - The Nazis.
Democracy has been corrupted and Paradox isn't happy.
This time round only, just due to snuggly's blatant advantage here.
I voted for timmargh, and its probably a wasted vote, for some one who under usual circumstances would be a front runner.
"One new "Notable" is elected every three months, in respect of their contribution to making UKchatforums.com a fun place to come and visit."
Snuggly blatantly makes the criteria why don't they just make him one anyway, same goes for most ex moderators as they have done this!
Personally i think second place (lets assume snuggly becomes the notable) should be made one as well, as there are people who should have the sacred urine stained name, and its a bit harsh to drop them down the pecking order when they make a valuable contribution anyway, because a staffie leaves.
I voted for timmargh, and its probably a wasted vote, for some one who under usual circumstances would be a front runner.
"One new "Notable" is elected every three months, in respect of their contribution to making UKchatforums.com a fun place to come and visit."
Snuggly blatantly makes the criteria why don't they just make him one anyway, same goes for most ex moderators as they have done this!
Personally i think second place (lets assume snuggly becomes the notable) should be made one as well, as there are people who should have the sacred urine stained name, and its a bit harsh to drop them down the pecking order when they make a valuable contribution anyway, because a staffie leaves.