The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
*Shakes head*
I do apologise. Ho ho.
I do apologise. Ho ho.
Page:
Forest Fan wrote:
> Just replying to posts, like everyone else.
I know but did you need 3 posts to say 'It worked', 'Kind of' and 'Exactly'?
> Just replying to posts, like everyone else.
I know but did you need 3 posts to say 'It worked', 'Kind of' and 'Exactly'?
Just replying to posts, like everyone else.
Forest Fan wrote:
> B@Z wrote:
> I have to agree with you there azul (well, there's a first time for
> everything). i can understand chris, who came up with the original,
> posting a second one. That went five pages into the view older
> topics, and then i posted sbout 50 times in it. i then got mocked by
> forest fan for not doing it proparly (he was doing it wrong), and
> now
> he has started a 3rd one, pointlessly. sheesh...
>
> Yeh well, no-ones on it are they?
Why do you have to reply to yourself 6 or 7 times (at least) in every topic? WHY!!!???
> B@Z wrote:
> I have to agree with you there azul (well, there's a first time for
> everything). i can understand chris, who came up with the original,
> posting a second one. That went five pages into the view older
> topics, and then i posted sbout 50 times in it. i then got mocked by
> forest fan for not doing it proparly (he was doing it wrong), and
> now
> he has started a 3rd one, pointlessly. sheesh...
>
> Yeh well, no-ones on it are they?
Why do you have to reply to yourself 6 or 7 times (at least) in every topic? WHY!!!???
Forest Fan wrote:
> Still waste of space, if you ask me, this topic.
Just like you.
> Still waste of space, if you ask me, this topic.
Just like you.
And you couldn't have responded to all in one solitary post, non?
And what has the fact that it isn't your topic got to do with anything?
Sheesh, it's a light hearted jibe, grow up you fundamentalist moron.
And what has the fact that it isn't your topic got to do with anything?
Sheesh, it's a light hearted jibe, grow up you fundamentalist moron.
Even though it's not my topic...
Azul wrote:
> FF, stop spamming. Please.
>
> It's a sin. Honest.
Spamming? And it's a sin. Anyway, wasn't spamming, just tring to respond to as many messages as possible.
> FF, stop spamming. Please.
>
> It's a sin. Honest.
Spamming? And it's a sin. Anyway, wasn't spamming, just tring to respond to as many messages as possible.
FF, stop spamming. Please.
It's a sin. Honest.
It's a sin. Honest.
Azul wrote:
> There's nothing to "get".
> It's just a mock of the continuous "Sports Personality
> Chain" threads, as there seem to be so many pointless ones when
> there's a perfectly good on already.
Still waste of space, if you ask me, this topic.
> There's nothing to "get".
> It's just a mock of the continuous "Sports Personality
> Chain" threads, as there seem to be so many pointless ones when
> there's a perfectly good on already.
Still waste of space, if you ask me, this topic.
B@Z wrote:
> I have to agree with you there azul (well, there's a first time for
> everything). i can understand chris, who came up with the original,
> posting a second one. That went five pages into the view older
> topics, and then i posted sbout 50 times in it. i then got mocked by
> forest fan for not doing it proparly (he was doing it wrong), and now
> he has started a 3rd one, pointlessly. sheesh...
Yeh well, no-ones on it are they?
> I have to agree with you there azul (well, there's a first time for
> everything). i can understand chris, who came up with the original,
> posting a second one. That went five pages into the view older
> topics, and then i posted sbout 50 times in it. i then got mocked by
> forest fan for not doing it proparly (he was doing it wrong), and now
> he has started a 3rd one, pointlessly. sheesh...
Yeh well, no-ones on it are they?
Page: