The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I am a fan of Stargate, but season 7 was a let-down as far as I was concerned. The "mighty battle" with Anubis was resolved far too easily. The so-call "best ever episode" (two-parter - with the TV crew) a few weeks ago was actually one of the worst episodes ever, in my opinion.
I would much rather they'd finished Farscape, which was far more promising.
The Farscape story was 'finished' (in a fashion) by a short story which appeared in the official magazine.
There was talk of a big-screen movie to finish it off, but I've heard nothing for a while. To be honest, I was so disappointed at yet another quality show being axed that I lost a lot of interest.
It was the only sci-fi thing I've ever liked, and was a damn fine programme. I'd rate it above SG1 anyday.
I think the plot was a bit too complex for the Yanks, that and the fact you really had to have been watching right from the very start to understand what's going on.
Compared to SG1, Star Trek and the like, where you can pretty much watch any episode as a stand-alone.
It was most fantastical, and if they brought it back, I'd be the happiest guy in the world.
Might have to grab the Series 1 DVD set.
But it turned out to be an amazing show, and I really didn't notice the puppets in the end. Pilot was an amazing piece of animatronics, and Scorpius is possibly the best bad guy since Darth Vader.
The last episode was a hell of a cliff-hanger - I mean, how could they possibly come back from that? Season 5 would have been great.
Farscape was easily the best sci-fi since Babylon 5, if only in terms of having a pre-scripted, continuous 5-year story arc. It's a real shame that Sci-Fi Channel did what they did.
As has been mentioned, shows like Star Trek are mostly rambling, one-off shows which take little concentration or brainpower to keep up with. Unfortunately, Stargate now seems to have gone the same way, pretty much.
Babylon 5 and Farscape were more complicated, because they were completely pre-planned and required minimal 'filler' episodes. So the stories could be entwined and were for the most part well thought out. Intelligent sci-fi, if you like.
The fact that both struggled to maintain high viewing figures in the U.S. (although Babylon 5 was thankfully finished) says much about the average U.S. viewer.
Strange though, isn't it? Sci-fi fans are supposedly geeks, so you would assume that they were smart enough to follow a more complex story than your average Star Trek 2-parter offers.