The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Matches so far for the big event:
Triple threat Heavyweight championship match, HHH Vs Shawn Michaels Vs Chris Benoit.
Eddie Guerrero Vs Kurt Angle WWE Championship.
Probable match, Mick Foley Vs Randy Orton for Intercontinental title.
Undertakers return will have to coincide with a match involving Kane. So expect to see Kane's involvment announced soon. Possibly against Jerico (providing he is fit) or Christian.
Would liked to have seen Stone Cold Steve Austin Vs Vince McMahn, but that storyline could be unfolding, and Wrestlemania came too soon.
But from what I have read, Stone Cold wants that match before he quits wrestling.
Triple threat Heavyweight championship match, HHH Vs Shawn Michaels Vs Chris Benoit.
Eddie Guerrero Vs Kurt Angle WWE Championship.
Probable match, Mick Foley Vs Randy Orton for Intercontinental title.
Undertakers return will have to coincide with a match involving Kane. So expect to see Kane's involvment announced soon. Possibly against Jerico (providing he is fit) or Christian.
Would liked to have seen Stone Cold Steve Austin Vs Vince McMahn, but that storyline could be unfolding, and Wrestlemania came too soon.
But from what I have read, Stone Cold wants that match before he quits wrestling.
Page:
apology accepted, i have been in such a mood many a time before
**RARE OCCURANCE:
I'm sorry.
END OF RARE OCCURANCE**
I am just in a foul, foul, FOUL mood at the moment.
I'm sorry.
END OF RARE OCCURANCE**
I am just in a foul, foul, FOUL mood at the moment.
Raven-ous wrote:
> LaLakersrule wrote:
>
> When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their
> storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be
> because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember
> he is Kane's father.
>
> If I remember, surely the the creative dept. do?
> How misinformed this reply is.
> I never said the reason he wouldn't be there was because he is
> supposed to be Kane's father. Infact, the reason he won't be there is
> because he said he wouldn't. The storyline complications merely
> cement this fact.
>
> Sheeeesh.
I wasn't saying you were wrong with your reason i was just making a sarcastic remark about the WWE creative team and how poor it is.
Sheeeesh
> LaLakersrule wrote:
>
> When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their
> storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be
> because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember
> he is Kane's father.
>
> If I remember, surely the the creative dept. do?
> How misinformed this reply is.
> I never said the reason he wouldn't be there was because he is
> supposed to be Kane's father. Infact, the reason he won't be there is
> because he said he wouldn't. The storyline complications merely
> cement this fact.
>
> Sheeeesh.
I wasn't saying you were wrong with your reason i was just making a sarcastic remark about the WWE creative team and how poor it is.
Sheeeesh
Raven-ous wrote:
> American Brain wrote:
>
Lol! Noticed that just before I closed the page!
> American Brain wrote:
>
Lol! Noticed that just before I closed the page!
> American Brain wrote:
>
> When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their
> storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be
> because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember
> he is Kane's father.
If I remember, surely the the creative dept. do?
How misinformed this reply is.
I never said the reason he wouldn't be there was because he is supposed to be Kane's father. Infact, the reason he won't be there is because he said he wouldn't. The storyline complications merely cement this fact.
Sheeeesh.
>
> When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their
> storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be
> because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember
> he is Kane's father.
If I remember, surely the the creative dept. do?
How misinformed this reply is.
I never said the reason he wouldn't be there was because he is supposed to be Kane's father. Infact, the reason he won't be there is because he said he wouldn't. The storyline complications merely cement this fact.
Sheeeesh.
Raven-ous wrote:
> As the story goes, Bearer is Kane's dad, so I think WWE are reluctant
> to use him. I agree.
>
> Thoughts?
When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember he is Kane's father.
> As the story goes, Bearer is Kane's dad, so I think WWE are reluctant
> to use him. I agree.
>
> Thoughts?
When was the last time the WWE actually had any continuity to their storylines?? Paul Bearer might not be at WM XX but that won't be because he's Kane's father. I doubt the creative team even remember he is Kane's father.
Paul Bearer to accompany Undertaker to the ring at Wrestlemania?
On NODQ.com, I(yes, ME) confirmed that he WILL NOT be part of WM. But others are adament that he will.
As the story goes, Bearer is Kane's dad, so I think WWE are reluctant to use him. I agree.
Thoughts?
On NODQ.com, I(yes, ME) confirmed that he WILL NOT be part of WM. But others are adament that he will.
As the story goes, Bearer is Kane's dad, so I think WWE are reluctant to use him. I agree.
Thoughts?
Heh, Heat usually sucks so highlights should be good :)
Totti wrote:
> I thought that the first hour was for WWE Heat and then the other four
> are for the Pay Per View itself.
I think that's right, but the Heat will be all highlights apart from one tag match.
> I thought that the first hour was for WWE Heat and then the other four
> are for the Pay Per View itself.
I think that's right, but the Heat will be all highlights apart from one tag match.
I thought that the first hour was for WWE Heat and then the other four are for the Pay Per View itself.
Page: