Viewing Thread:
"GAD"

Anyone ever won a GAD for a review twice as long - so, you've posted it in 2 parts in 2 different review forms?
Just a-wondering, because I can't get this review under 3000 - thinking about expanding it out instead.

Huh?
Talk to me.

AfroJoe wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
> The review length used to be 5,000 characters a long time ago
> though,
> didnt it.
>
> 4,000.
>
> Same thing, really.

It was once unlimited.

It is a bit of a pain having to write reviews so short, therefore making you leave out some of the best bits, but it does have one advantage- it makes you get to the verdict without blabbering on too much.

I end up with only a couple of paragraphs in soem reviews because I dwell on one section - most of my recent ones have been like that I can't fit everything in. I normally don't have a problem, though.

Having said that, my recent reviews have been rubbish.

Paradox: wrote:
> The review length used to be 5,000 characters a long time ago though,
> didnt it.

4,000.

Same thing, really.

Heh - if you were that intelligent, you wouldn't have a problem decreasing its size.

SR reduced it for a reason. Too many books were being published online.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
>Talk to me.

Whats your phone number then....

It's never happened.

The review length used to be 5,000 characters a long time ago though, didnt it.

Ask a Staffie...

English_Bloke wrote:
> Why do people struggle with the word limit?

I can't help my overflowing intelligence.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:

>
> Huh?
> Talk to me.

Hi

a/s/l