The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Its propobly already been posted, but Nitendojo have a new layout. I'd never really paid that much attention to the site, but it seems much better.
Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding them back.
Go check it out.
Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding them back.
Go check it out.
Its propobly already been posted, but Nitendojo have a new layout. I'd never really paid that much attention to the site, but it seems much better.
Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding them back.
Go check it out.
Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding them back.
Go check it out.
Syphonical wrote:
> Its propobly already been posted, but Nitendojo have a new layout. I'd
> never really paid that much attention to the site, but it seems much
> better.
>
> Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
>
> Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding
> them back.
>
> Go check it out.
It looks better than it did before at least
> Its propobly already been posted, but Nitendojo have a new layout. I'd
> never really paid that much attention to the site, but it seems much
> better.
>
> Just been reading some editorials and they're very intresting.
>
> Never thought i'd say it, but it does seem like Miyamoto is holding
> them back.
>
> Go check it out.
It looks better than it did before at least
leflus, there was absolutely no need to quote that whole message, as nobody else had posted before you other than the original poster.
Also, I find it funny that you're quoting all these large messages and putting only a couple of words below it. I find this funny because quoting doesn't even add on to your total word count. It's only whatever you actually post.
Haha.
Also, I find it funny that you're quoting all these large messages and putting only a couple of words below it. I find this funny because quoting doesn't even add on to your total word count. It's only whatever you actually post.
Haha.
My editorials are much better
*hugs his site*
*hugs his site*
AfroJoe wrote:
> leflus, there was absolutely no need to quote that whole message, as
> nobody else had posted before you other than the original poster.
>
> Also, I find it funny that you're quoting all these large messages
> and putting only a couple of words below it. I find this funny
> because quoting doesn't even add on to your total word count. It's
> only whatever you actually post.
>
> Haha.
Eh? Quoting doesn't count?
Beggar!
;)
> leflus, there was absolutely no need to quote that whole message, as
> nobody else had posted before you other than the original poster.
>
> Also, I find it funny that you're quoting all these large messages
> and putting only a couple of words below it. I find this funny
> because quoting doesn't even add on to your total word count. It's
> only whatever you actually post.
>
> Haha.
Eh? Quoting doesn't count?
Beggar!
;)
Really, though, it doesn't.
Or so some staff wilton said.
Or so some staff wilton said.