Viewing Thread:
"Pay It Forward"

I wasn't sure what to expect here, but that was a damn good film.

Psy©ho Fox wrote:
> J Nash wrote:
> It had the crappiest ending ever.
>
> Umm I think everybody who has seen it and liked it thought the ending
> was soo moving, but i just think you're heartless if you think
> otherwise.

Yeah. Right.

It was alright Sunday night viewing

Yup, still got one but only three games now after much carelessness - I'll go have a look and reply in the appropriate thread.

Gonzo!

I tried to catch you attention earlier and failed. You mentioned a Neo Geo Pocket, do you have one? Classic Games forum explains why...

Psy©ho Fox wrote:
> Do all you people have jobs as bad film critics that never give
> brilliant fims good reveiws?
> This film got 4-6 Oscars for crying out loud, somebody does a better
> job at reveiwing the film than you and thought it was soo good it
> deserved all of them.

You're either joking or an opinion-less fool - I watch a film and think "well, did I like that?", not "did someone else like that?".

And that's forgetting that you're completely wrong about the Oscars thing, in that it won a total of zero. It also managed a haul of zero nominations. Consulting imdb, it did manage a Blockbuster Entertainment award though - prestigious. Oh, and Oscars are also far from the final arbiter of a good film, especially seeing as the majority of them are given out as hindsight apologies for overlooking someone's work from a previous movie.

All in all, well done. Your post is both factually incorrect and shows a really bad taste in films. You wouldn’t happen to be Paul Ross, would you?

It was alright, at the start.
Then everyone started being really nice and I wasn't sure whether to laugh or throw up.

Good idea, though - but it would never work. People are too cynical.

You are forgetting that it all is a matter of opinion.

Dr Gonzo wrote:
> Awful, awful film. Totally over egged; absolute trash that really
> shows just how shallow mainstream film making has gotten. Simplicity
> is almost always the best way to get emotion from an audience – half
> an hour of “isn’t this quite sad?”, and an encore of “doesn’t it make
> you think about yourself?” really isn’t needed. It’s Richard and
> Judy film making.

Do all you people have jobs as bad film critics that never give brilliant fims good reveiws?
This film got 4-6 Oscars for crying out loud, somebody does a better job at reveiwing the film than you and thought it was soo good it deserved all of them.

J Nash wrote:
> It had the crappiest ending ever.

Umm I think everybody who has seen it and liked it thought the ending was soo moving, but i just think you're heartless if you think otherwise.

Didn’t like the look of it myself. From the trailers it looked like overbearing, sloppy, sentimental horsecrep.