The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Aye, you know they get to you.
That one for "Tizer" - 'Itz a red thing'. Aghh.
And that other one for Stella Artois that they've been playing for years, the one where the young man gets his father beer and drinks it, surprsingly.
Adverts which annoy you?
That one for "Tizer" - 'Itz a red thing'. Aghh.
And that other one for Stella Artois that they've been playing for years, the one where the young man gets his father beer and drinks it, surprsingly.
Adverts which annoy you?
Page:
That one with David Beckham and the phone, where he takes pictures all abut the house. Sums up camera phones - you have to be on his wages to afford one!!!
The Halifax man when he sings. Could shoot the TV. Haven't seen him for a while though, maybe they banned him or too many people complained. *cringe*
Munson wrote:
> That annoying car insurance ad, with the grinning Micheal Winner
> telling us he really is a safe driver and it's just an advert.
The other really annoying bit is that he's so rich, yet in the ad he drives a Toyota Corolla and a Saab 9/3.
Those adverts are also so cheesy it's unbelievable. but it could've been worse: They COULD have signed the Hamiltons.
> That annoying car insurance ad, with the grinning Micheal Winner
> telling us he really is a safe driver and it's just an advert.
The other really annoying bit is that he's so rich, yet in the ad he drives a Toyota Corolla and a Saab 9/3.
Those adverts are also so cheesy it's unbelievable. but it could've been worse: They COULD have signed the Hamiltons.
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> Dringo wrote:
> No that advert is fine untill the "woohoo"...
>
> Yeah, I'd agree with that. A bit girly, isn't it?! :-)
I don't know how to describe it... I just feel like crying.
> Dringo wrote:
> No that advert is fine untill the "woohoo"...
>
> Yeah, I'd agree with that. A bit girly, isn't it?! :-)
I don't know how to describe it... I just feel like crying.
That annoying car insurance ad, with the grinning Micheal Winner telling us he really is a safe driver and it's just an advert.
Don't even get me started on the infamous "araahhhhmahhhtic spaaahhccesss" woman.
It's not so much the advert, just her.
HER!
ARRRRRGHHHHHHHHHH
That's 400 quids worth of therapy down the pan.
It's not so much the advert, just her.
HER!
ARRRRRGHHHHHHHHHH
That's 400 quids worth of therapy down the pan.
Yes car credit.
Could I get a loan?
Yes, you could.
Could I get a new car?
Yes, you could.
Could I drive away in it today?
Yes, you could.
Could I get mauled by vicious badgers that have escaped from a lab?
Yes, you could.
Could I get a loan?
Yes, you could.
Could I get a new car?
Yes, you could.
Could I drive away in it today?
Yes, you could.
Could I get mauled by vicious badgers that have escaped from a lab?
Yes, you could.
Dringo wrote:
> No that advert is fine untill the "woohoo"...
Yeah, I'd agree with that. A bit girly, isn't it?! :-)
> No that advert is fine untill the "woohoo"...
Yeah, I'd agree with that. A bit girly, isn't it?! :-)
Being annoying is the wrong way to go about it. I don't buy things from people who annoy me.
But that's what adverts are supposed to do, be remembered. The advertiser will annoy you or just make something memorable to get it into your head, then hopefully, you'll want the product/service.
Page: