The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://gamesradar.msn.co.uk/news/default.asp?pagetypeid=2&articleid=35970&subsectionid=1588[/URL]
...or are Gamesradar a bunch of retards?
You decide.
...or are Gamesradar a bunch of retards?
You decide.
Page:
I have no friends!
LOLOLO
(from here, on msn *weeps*)
LOLOLO
(from here, on msn *weeps*)
:'{
Nudges make me sad.
Nudges make me sad.
Haha yeah I know I was kidding
And I'm hardly ever on MSN anyway
And I'm hardly ever on MSN anyway
fixed
I did it because A I'm bored and B you're posts will be deleted by the time he reads it, most likely, so I thought I'd spare you the time waste
And I didn't notice your name wasnt on it.
And also you nudged me into oblivion dammit. I had no choice but to block you, and you blocked me, and so it went on. For shame
I did it because A I'm bored and B you're posts will be deleted by the time he reads it, most likely, so I thought I'd spare you the time waste
And I didn't notice your name wasnt on it.
And also you nudged me into oblivion dammit. I had no choice but to block you, and you blocked me, and so it went on. For shame
i make dis shizzle look goood
You'd better not take credit for being the person that finally made Dringo get on his knees and accept that he's a gibbering idiot
I concur
Dringo wrote:
> The I-pod is far easier to use.
kookoocachoo whatever the hell he's called, Azul wrote:
That's a load of crap.
> The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
Congratulations! You're talking bullsh*t!
The Zen has a 98dB SNR whereas the iPod only has a 90dB SNR.
Well done on justifying your point.
> The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software
> into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to
> grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles
> behind I-tunes.
AHAHAHA. You must be pretty slow if you can't use their gloriously simple and extremely catering software.
> and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too
> over responsive and difficult to use.
Yeah except you can change the sensitivity you utter dolt
> The I-pod is far easier to use.
kookoocachoo whatever the hell he's called, Azul wrote:
That's a load of crap.
> The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
Congratulations! You're talking bullsh*t!
The Zen has a 98dB SNR whereas the iPod only has a 90dB SNR.
Well done on justifying your point.
> The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software
> into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to
> grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles
> behind I-tunes.
AHAHAHA. You must be pretty slow if you can't use their gloriously simple and extremely catering software.
> and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too
> over responsive and difficult to use.
Yeah except you can change the sensitivity you utter dolt
Dringo wrote:
> The I-pod is far easier to use.
That's a load of crap.
> The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
Congratulations! You're talking bullsh*t!
The Zen has a 98dB SNR whereas the iPod only has a 90dB SNR.
Well done on justifying your point.
> The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software
> into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to
> grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles
> behind I-tunes.
AHAHAHA. You must be pretty slow if you can't use their gloriously simple and extremely catering software.
> and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too
> over responsive and difficult to use.
Yeah except you can change the sensitivity you utter dolt
> The I-pod is far easier to use.
That's a load of crap.
> The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
Congratulations! You're talking bullsh*t!
The Zen has a 98dB SNR whereas the iPod only has a 90dB SNR.
Well done on justifying your point.
> The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software
> into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to
> grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles
> behind I-tunes.
AHAHAHA. You must be pretty slow if you can't use their gloriously simple and extremely catering software.
> and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too
> over responsive and difficult to use.
Yeah except you can change the sensitivity you utter dolt
Memorandum! wrote:
> so the Zen's battery is better, and it offers the same (or more)
> capacity at a lower cost....yet the iPod is still better?
>
> I don't get it.
The I-pod is far easier to use.
The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles behind I-tunes.
and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too over responsive and difficult to use.
But the battery life is 100000 times better than what Apple force down your throats.
> so the Zen's battery is better, and it offers the same (or more)
> capacity at a lower cost....yet the iPod is still better?
>
> I don't get it.
The I-pod is far easier to use.
The I-pod sound quality, although quieter, is better.
The I-pods software, A.K.A I-tunes, kicks the abysmal Zen's software into submission. I nearly sold my Zen because I just couldn't get to grips with it. I'm kinda getting there now but it is still miles behind I-tunes.
and finally the little "touch" stick on the Zen is far too over responsive and difficult to use.
But the battery life is 100000 times better than what Apple force down your throats.
Page: