The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Who thinks this game loks good? I don't think there will be much change. But i'll end up getting it anyway. Who else will?
The Medal of Honor games rarely change in overall design, and judging by the 6.4 score it got at gamespot, this one hasn't done much different either.
But, Pacific assault on the PC is looking top notch. It's already got a few new ideas thrown in and the graphics certainly are allot better, jungle environments actually look like jungles rather than long corridors surrounded by impassible trees. Either way, Medal of Honor is pretty guff when compared to Call of Duty, the best World War 2 game around.
But, Pacific assault on the PC is looking top notch. It's already got a few new ideas thrown in and the graphics certainly are allot better, jungle environments actually look like jungles rather than long corridors surrounded by impassible trees. Either way, Medal of Honor is pretty guff when compared to Call of Duty, the best World War 2 game around.
I agree muchly
The graphics are cack. Not totaly ugly, just pretty damn poor.
It is quite a good game, but it just has an air of, well, badness about some of it. Levels like Arnhem Nights and D-Day save it from total rubbishness. Because they rock.
It is quite a good game, but it just has an air of, well, badness about some of it. Levels like Arnhem Nights and D-Day save it from total rubbishness. Because they rock.
Cyclone wrote:
> MOH:F is ridiculous.
> Some great levels (D-Day, Arnhem) spoiled by rubbish controls, cack
> graphics and some really boring levels (That one in a Dutch
> village).
>
> Not all that special, not all that bad.
>
> Rising Sun is certainly not on my list.
The Arnhem Nights is a great level, the best in the game. The village level is a pile of toss I agree and the controls were somewhat awkward but the graphics are not bad and the gameplay is great.
> MOH:F is ridiculous.
> Some great levels (D-Day, Arnhem) spoiled by rubbish controls, cack
> graphics and some really boring levels (That one in a Dutch
> village).
>
> Not all that special, not all that bad.
>
> Rising Sun is certainly not on my list.
The Arnhem Nights is a great level, the best in the game. The village level is a pile of toss I agree and the controls were somewhat awkward but the graphics are not bad and the gameplay is great.
I just hope you get to keep the rifle all the way through on this one. It's my favourite gun on the game.
MOH:F is ridiculous.
Some great levels (D-Day, Arnhem) spoiled by rubbish controls, cack graphics and some really boring levels (That one in a Dutch village).
Not all that special, not all that bad.
Rising Sun is certainly not on my list.
Some great levels (D-Day, Arnhem) spoiled by rubbish controls, cack graphics and some really boring levels (That one in a Dutch village).
Not all that special, not all that bad.
Rising Sun is certainly not on my list.
I think the game looks great, I have a 10 min preview I got free with PSw magazine, the graphics arent a greal deal better than Frontline but the gameplay looks good and the levels sound very promising. I really did love Frontline and I will almost certainly be getting this game too.
Who thinks this game loks good? I don't think there will be much change. But i'll end up getting it anyway. Who else will?