The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
But could this mean the 'Capcom 3' (after Dead Pheonix... dying) are, after all, temporarily exclusive?
Or maybe not. But who cares, I've got Viewtiful Joe in its lovely pink case. Must... play...
But could this mean the 'Capcom 3' (after Dead Pheonix... dying) are, after all, temporarily exclusive?
Or maybe not. But who cares, I've got Viewtiful Joe in its lovely pink case. Must... play...
Maybe they decided to leave the 'only for' out of the corner to keep their options open?
Alternatively maybe the game is heading to the GBA in which case it shouldnt have a 'only for' logo on the GC case?
However my biggest concern with Capcom isnt whether they produce for MS but whetherthey ditch the GC altogether and become exclusive to the X-box/X-box 2.
These are just rumours tho... i just hope MS dont try to buy the big players out of the market in an attempt to ensure their own domination, when we think about MS we tend to think of a company that dosnt want to share its market... they are/have and always be an operation that wants it all and is prepared to pay for it, whatever the cost.
The courts did decide that MS were manipulating the market but i havnt heard of anything similar surrounding the console market.
Ms are desperate to crack Japan and theres no better way than to buy out a major ball player (like Capcom) lets face it stranger things have happened and money talks, actually no - money screams.
And if MS waved that blank cheque, they'd better be ready to spend a LOT of money...
The 'only for' isnt really tacky tho, it shows commitment to a console for any specific software produced.
If Capcom deliberatley left the tag off then they must have visions of releasing the game on another console even if it were the GBA.
The only other solution is that there was some kind of manufacturing error whereas the producers simply forgot about the tag, but i highly doubt this.