The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Why oh why, Now before I start this topic I want you to know that I don't complain very much, I have won 2 games in the month of February and I am very thankful to SR but the one thing I don't understand is why the Gameaday winner selecter, as good as his/her form was in February picks some reviews of games that haven't been released yet as winners. You often see that so-and-so has won on the 7/7/2000 because of a MGS2 review. I just don't see the point, I mean if it is a comment then put comment or if it is a discussion piece put MGS2 discussion but the amount of times that this winner selected has decided that someone should win for a ZOE/MGS2/Conker's BFD REVIEW is amazing, plain daft I say. Like I said, I am not complaining, I am happy with my two games and I only wish everyone else the best of luck for their topics but why oh why, does this happen?!?!?!?!? i JUST DON'T SEE HOW PEOPLE CAN REVIEW GAMES THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED, ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE WHO PICK THAT GAME AS THEIR PRIZE!!!!
The Game
Now...I had better get on with that Conker Review...A ha...UK Reviews...
*click*
The Game
Now...I had better get on with that Conker Review...A ha...UK Reviews...
*click*
Very soon, you're time will come for the midichlorians flow through you.
From the prophecy, you are. The way the balance tilts, up to you it is!
Ok I know that was a rubbish impression but we all have our wierd moments....
From the prophecy, you are. The way the balance tilts, up to you it is!
Ok I know that was a rubbish impression but we all have our wierd moments....
Ive never won... so what the hell do I know?! :)
I agree totally!
Especially when released games that I want to review aren't even on there!
Especially when released games that I want to review aren't even on there!
Why oh why, Now before I start this topic I want you to know that I don't complain very much, I have won 2 games in the month of February and I am very thankful to SR but the one thing I don't understand is why the Gameaday winner selecter, as good as his/her form was in February picks some reviews of games that haven't been released yet as winners. You often see that so-and-so has won on the 7/7/2000 because of a MGS2 review. I just don't see the point, I mean if it is a comment then put comment or if it is a discussion piece put MGS2 discussion but the amount of times that this winner selected has decided that someone should win for a ZOE/MGS2/Conker's BFD REVIEW is amazing, plain daft I say. Like I said, I am not complaining, I am happy with my two games and I only wish everyone else the best of luck for their topics but why oh why, does this happen?!?!?!?!? i JUST DON'T SEE HOW PEOPLE CAN REVIEW GAMES THEY HAVEN'T PLAYED, ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE WHO PICK THAT GAME AS THEIR PRIZE!!!!
The Game
Now...I had better get on with that Conker Review...A ha...UK Reviews...
*click*
The Game
Now...I had better get on with that Conker Review...A ha...UK Reviews...
*click*