The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Admittedly, if the machine was being released by a newer company, the consoles wouldnt be given that much thought (Indreamaesq)...
Howeer, if the X-Box was being released by another company, would t be a more attractive propersition?
As an example, I'm loathe to say Sega, since they already have a fair following, and a great deal of respect within the gameing community... equally another general electronics company like Panasonic would probably put the X-Box in the IOndreamer catagory...
In fact it would seem if there was to be a new major contenter into the market that Microsoft is one of the few company able to do it?...
... However despite the mess of this mailing, the Shanks encasulated questions are...
Would you be more prone to like the X-Box if the hardware were released by an alternate manufacturer?
Who would have to be releasing the X-Box for you to take an interest in it?
Frankly, though, I can't imagine that I'll ever buy a X-Box. Just doesn't seem to be enough incentive.
1) It's going to be more expensive than I think a console should *ever* be.
2) The vast majority of its games are cross-platformers - hence on cheaper systems - and even its so-called 'exclusive' ones will likely be ported over to the PC, since Microsoft isn't about to give up on the PC gaming market. I have a nice PC; I'll play them there.
3) Word has it they'll be shipped with a reboot disc. I'm sorry, but what? Let me get this straight: the thing has an internal hard drive (8 GBs) and I may have to perform a full-format on it, after paying the kind of money I'd be putting down for it? IMO, it would've been better if Microsoft had used an exterior hard drive and just had it come with the system.
Those are my reasons. I don't hate Microsoft; it's useful in its own way. People who HATE Microsoft, IMO, need to get a life.
I'm not saying that it's healthy for the market to have one major GUI and applications developer, it's not, but Microsoft have mainly got to where they are through hard work. There are bad things about the company, but then this can be said about most major companies. As I said, people hate success and will instantly find something wrong with it. I curse at windows sometimes, but it doesn't mean Bill Gates is evil!
Likewise, the X-Box is simply a product of Microsoft's research and development and basically their hard work. Whether you like the name or not, they've put a lot of work into this and they don't want to see it fail, just as any other console developer wants their console to be successful.
I have not, however, ruled out buying an X-box - though it will have to offer me something totally unique that I really 'must have' and can't get anywhere else.
Admittedly, if the machine was being released by a newer company, the consoles wouldnt be given that much thought (Indreamaesq)...
Howeer, if the X-Box was being released by another company, would t be a more attractive propersition?
As an example, I'm loathe to say Sega, since they already have a fair following, and a great deal of respect within the gameing community... equally another general electronics company like Panasonic would probably put the X-Box in the IOndreamer catagory...
In fact it would seem if there was to be a new major contenter into the market that Microsoft is one of the few company able to do it?...
... However despite the mess of this mailing, the Shanks encasulated questions are...
Would you be more prone to like the X-Box if the hardware were released by an alternate manufacturer?
Who would have to be releasing the X-Box for you to take an interest in it?