GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Weapons grade uranium found in Iran"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Fri 12/09/03 at 21:25
Regular
"no longer El Blokey"
Posts: 4,471
This little tidbit just about made it into the news. An official from an international...thing investigating the find has said they don't wish to "come to any conclusions" and have given Iran a while to explain themselves.

wtf

why haven't we bombed them yet. where is george bush?

This is ridiculous.
Sun 14/09/03 at 20:37
"Mimmargh!"
Posts: 2,929
Well thats politics.
Firstly Iran would be much harder to take over.

Firstly Iran is highly mountainous, secondly they have not been bombed into submission for the past 10 years, they also have a standing, functioning army, and of course they could already have WOMD.
Also, they are far more likely to give these weapons to terrorists in retaliation to an invasion than Saddam would be.

Certainly Iran is the most dangerous out of the Axis of Evil (TM).
It clearly has some involved weapons programme or at least a capability to start one. It is also a fundamentalist theocracy.

Iraq on the other-hand, well I think it was always very dubios that they had any programme going on after sanctions and bombings. Plus Saddam would not pass weapons onto Islamic terrorists who would probably turn against his 'ungodly' regime first.

And North Korea, while probably having the most advanced weapons programme would have little insentive to give the weapons to terrorists. Personally I think they only want them for self-defence, though I believe a dictatorship should not have them, and also I think it is clear that North Korea is the most open to dialogue.

Thus I think the U.S. may well regret ignoring Iran. They could easilly crush their military but the resistance would most likely be far worse than Iraq as well as the casulties if war was committed to. The U.S. may be superior in military but as I said before there is actually and army to fight other than your allies, unlike in Iraq.
Fri 12/09/03 at 22:11
Regular
Posts: 23,218
hmm so this is proof that Iran has WMD capabilites yet when they bombed Iraq they had none?

All Dubya needs to do now is tell his troops to go into Iran via syria.
Fri 12/09/03 at 21:35
Regular
"twothousandandtits"
Posts: 11,024
They are far more capable of a WMD attack than Iraq are/were, and yet we do nothing. Apparently the reason for this is that "we can't fight a thousand battles". But by the time the whole Iraq business has calmed down no one will remember this.
Fri 12/09/03 at 21:25
Regular
"no longer El Blokey"
Posts: 4,471
This little tidbit just about made it into the news. An official from an international...thing investigating the find has said they don't wish to "come to any conclusions" and have given Iran a while to explain themselves.

wtf

why haven't we bombed them yet. where is george bush?

This is ridiculous.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Many thanks!
You were 100% right - great support!
I am delighted.
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do. I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.