The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
Now after the tradgedy of September 11th, 2 years ago today, the war on terrorism went into play. Now Iraq were told to own up to any weapons of mass destruction they had because they are, in a nutshell, threatened by them. But hold on, America spend billions of dollars each year making nuclear weaponry and in what cause? Surely it is made to be used if needs be and I am sure that if Iraq were clever enough to make nuclear weapons they know the consequences the detonation of one has on the planet.
In a recent internet poll, George Bush was voted as the second most dangerous man on the planet. Now the people who voted werent phychologists or experts on the subject matter but they must show a degree of fear to vote him as one of the most dangerous men on the planet. I personally do not feel comfortable in the knowledge that he is in control of a bevy of weaponry. I felt just as uncomfortable when I thought the Iraqis had them.
What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else can. Where's the logic in that?
I am sure the more politically minded of you will be offended by my mild understanding of the subject but this is merely the point of view of a regular ordinary guy.
"There's only one kind of Bush I like, and it sure isn't George"
Not because of relevance of any kind, just because the people that hang around the General Chat forum are slightly less likely to reply seriously to your post.
> What it comes down to is that America are trying to police the globe
> and are contradicting themselves. They are the bullies of the
> playground that is planet earth, they can have nukes but nobody else
> can. Where's the logic in that?
---
Oh, and just while the topic is here, I thought I'd point out that America isn't the only country with nukes. Granted, your points about America ruling over everything and being the bullies are fair enough, but there are plenty of other countries that have nuclear capabilities. Maybe not on such a large scale like America, but there are nukes elsewhere.