Viewing Thread:
"Meh????"

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[email protected]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially executable attachment "document_9446.pif"
This form of attachment has been used by
recent viruses or other malware.
If you meant to send this file then please
package it up as a zip file and resend it.

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path:
Received: from chello213047072137.14.vie.surfer.at ([213.47.72.137]
helo=FLORIAN)
by smtp.imv.au.dk with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
id 19u6ob-0006jZ-00
for [email protected]; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:47:05 +0200
From:
To:
Subject: Re: That movie
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:47:19 +0200
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_NextPart_000_008DE7D1"
Message-Id:

This is a multipart message in MIME format

--_NextPart_000_008DE7D1
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

See the attached file for details
--_NextPart_000_008DE7D1
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="document_9446.pif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="document_9446.pif"

This was sent to me today on my hotmail account and a couple of others which were the same as this! I have not sent these e-mails out....so why am i receiving this?

I see (said the blind man to his deaf daughter)

bah, oh well if i knew who mod was *hint* *hint*

Mod. wrote:

> NB: Quazi - In my 'real' id I'm actually a longer standing member
> than your 899 days! So 'respect'!
>

It was Mod that started the lots of days = respect theory, my post was incorrect as I assumed Mod had previously been banned but now it seems he is just using a different Username. And your right it is a free country and everyone has as musch right as the next man to criticise a post.

End of conversation I hope.

You just seem to think that a persons IQ/status/quality of post is directly proportional to how long they've been registered on these forums. Clearly that isn't the case, and Mod has as much right to criticise as you or I have.

And he's right, too.

eh ?, what's wrong with it - ducks to avoid abuse.

Valentino Rossi wrote:
> Obviously someone who has been banned, so how does he expect the
> respect of a 900+ dayer ?


If you still didn't know how to write a basic post after 900 days practise, you would be ridiculed too.

I actually do have to agree with Mod. on this one...

When you're looking through the pages for say a Networking thread that you know exists, it's a sod looking for it when the title is something like 'How?'

Obviously someone who has been banned, so how does he expect the respect of a 900+ dayer ?

Mod. wrote:
> Meh???? Meh???? Meh???? Meh???? Meh????
> unknown kernel - is right. Come on this is a forum on Web
> Design,PC,Internet and Freeola - Let's have a descriptive subject
> title, to help everyone - Hopefully FREEOLA will start refusing daft
> subjects...
>
> NB: Quazi - In my 'real' id I'm actually a longer standing member
> than your 899 days! So 'respect'!
>
> Mod!

Who are you????

Meh???? Meh???? Meh???? Meh???? Meh????
unknown kernel - is right. Come on this is a forum on Web Design,PC,Internet and Freeola - Let's have a descriptive subject title, to help everyone - Hopefully FREEOLA will start refusing daft subjects...

NB: Quazi - In my 'real' id I'm actually a longer standing member than your 899 days! So 'respect'!

Mod!