The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
And me swearing because they wanted Chicago... CHICAGO? Urgh
Yeah so I thought the film would be scarier but it was more an after affect film and my imagination was everywhere when I went to sleep. It was alright but not as good as I thought it would have been.
> Seriously guys, there can be no major critiscisms of it. It wasn't
> SUPPOSED to be a horror film (certainly not in the standard Hollywood
> HORROR genre anyway), was shot incredibly stylishly, and above all
> had some seriously deep thought behind it.
It wasn't supposed to be a horror film? What are you talking about, it had Zombie's in!! What sort of film has killer zombies in but claims its not a horror?? And "seriously deep thought"?? I don't know what your talking about there....
28 Days. A British based production, low budget, little major studio influence, an absolute success story of British cinema!
Seriously guys, there can be no major critiscisms of it. It wasn't SUPPOSED to be a horror film (certainly not in the standard Hollywood HORROR genre anyway), was shot incredibly stylishly, and above all had some seriously deep thought behind it.
Independent film one, Hollywood nil.
But opinions are opinions.
I liked it, although towards the end it slipped into daftness, and it seemed as though the makers rushed it.
good stuff though
I enjoyed this film. In fact, I'm going to watch it again tonight.
I think it's one of those things you either love or hate. My mates liked it, I didn't.
Apparently a sequel
I sometimes worry about my friends
I really liked it. Though when I saw it I hadn't actually heard of it before, so there was no big hype up for me.
No where near as good as 28 Days with Sandra Bullock though *Runs away*