The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, I have been banned. yes, i was stupid. Yes, i had fun. Yes, you're all gullible retards.
You ban me for changing the colour of my name and scaring a few members (which is apparently infringment of the rules) but people like Crazy Col spam for months and what happens? You get 'angry'.
Double standards, SR.
If someone in life would've started this it would be a 'hilarious commentary on pop-culture', but i do it and I'm a moron.
Oh well.
I'll miss your corrupt GAD's, wrong bannings (mine wasn't, but many have been) and your 'We're cheap but charge 2x more than our competitors on most items' ways.
Goodbye.
Tribute.
You ban me for changing the colour of my name and scaring a few members (which is apparently infringment of the rules) but people like Crazy Col spam for months and what happens? You get 'angry'.
Double standards, SR.
If someone in life would've started this it would be a 'hilarious commentary on pop-culture', but i do it and I'm a moron.
Oh well.
I'll miss your corrupt GAD's, wrong bannings (mine wasn't, but many have been) and your 'We're cheap but charge 2x more than our competitors on most items' ways.
Goodbye.
Tribute.
Page:
You're banned, leave already!
Absolu† Neó wrote:
> Although I agree with the banning - Rules on here aren't always
> consistant are they?
Amen.
> Although I agree with the banning - Rules on here aren't always
> consistant are they?
Amen.
The craziest Col! wrote:
> So for some strange reason, they get banned and I'm accused of
> spamming, which I don't do anymore.
I don't pretend I've hacked the system anymore, but I'm still banned, ain't I?
And where are the 'rules', Snuggly?
Goodbye.
(again)
> So for some strange reason, they get banned and I'm accused of
> spamming, which I don't do anymore.
I don't pretend I've hacked the system anymore, but I'm still banned, ain't I?
And where are the 'rules', Snuggly?
Goodbye.
(again)
WHAT? QUESTION SR WILL YOU?!?
......
ban this man.
......
ban this man.
Mr Snuggly wrote:
> Sorry chum, them's the rules, you had to go.
Rules?
Although I agree with the banning - Rules on here aren't always consistant are they?
> Sorry chum, them's the rules, you had to go.
Rules?
Although I agree with the banning - Rules on here aren't always consistant are they?
What I was trying to gte over is that he used me as an example, but I didn't cause mass controversy and cause people to worry, did I?
The craziest Col! wrote:
> Do I do it anymore?
No you don't but thats wasn't my point was it?
> Do I do it anymore?
No you don't but thats wasn't my point was it?
You got banned because you comprimised our security and tarnished the company's reputation, and gave the impression that you had access to other people's details. It wasn't funny, no one laughed. And you, and others, wasted half my morning sorting out pointless crap like this when I could have been doing something more productive. That's why.
It's the same principle as a bomb scare. You might have never had a bomb or indeed intend to blow anyone up, but you still said you did and caused everyone to panic. Sorry chum, them's the rules, you had to go.
It's the same principle as a bomb scare. You might have never had a bomb or indeed intend to blow anyone up, but you still said you did and caused everyone to panic. Sorry chum, them's the rules, you had to go.
Absolu† Neó wrote:
> But you did hell of a lot when you first signed up and people have
> been banned for exactly what you did, hence Tribute identifying that
> fact.
Do I do it anymore?
> But you did hell of a lot when you first signed up and people have
> been banned for exactly what you did, hence Tribute identifying that
> fact.
Do I do it anymore?
But you did hell of a lot when you first signed up and people have been banned for exactly what you did, hence Tribute identifying that fact.
Page: