The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
They should have sold the old wembley to arsenal and relocated the new wembley to just outside london. That wasy they would have raised funds and not had it slap bang in the middle of the city, in prime pikey country.
> Black Demon wrote:
> Also costs would
> be split and as someone said, spurs may actually get good.
>
>
> Now now, lets not get too carried away :D
lol i had a feeling someone may get in there with that snide comment.
:cD
Also costs would
> be split and as someone said, spurs may actually get good.
Now now, lets not get too carried away :D
Silly Nat...
:cD
And I'm sure the fans wouldn't like to see the 2 rivals sharing the same ground, either.
Eventually, we'd probably end-up with another "Wimbledon at Selhurst Park" kind of problem, once Arsénal and Spurs eventually end all plans of getting "their own" new stadium.
Plus also why couldn't Spurs and Arsenal ground share? Inter and AC share the San Siro after all.
The only thing i could see causing outcry is that Arsenal just get a free stadium while other teams have had to spend money rebuilding theirs. So will the FA be paying any compensation to the other clubs?
personally. i would love to see arsenal play in wembley and we do have one of the best ground staff in the premiership.
i would like the idea, especially if tottenham suddenly got really good.
i would prefer ashburton grove on our own, but not if it cripples us. they better make the decision soon though, if they are, theyre just wasting money at the moment.