GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"[FILM] Star Trek (2009)"

The "Retro Game Reviews" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Mon 11/05/09 at 09:59
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Star Trek. A name which some sci-fi fans swoon over, a sacred franchise that shall not be tampered with. It must have involved a fair bit of trepidation then for JJ Abrams to tackle the franchise head on by completely turning it on its head.

Any lesser director would suggest a new crew and a different era, a next-next Generation as it were, but Abrams has taken the herculean task on his shoulders of bringing us a new cast playing some of the most iconic roles in sci-fi history. It’s brave, bold and most importantly; it pays off.

Why does it work? Well, firstly because of the cast. Chris Pine, the new Kirk, is great, despite the plot trying to make us hate his initial ‘space-brat’ character. He makes the part his own without tripping over the obvious clichés of William Shatner-esque old Kirk. Zachary Quinto seems to have been born to play young spock, with Nimoy going on record as being suitably impressed with his protégé. Karl Urban does his best Bones impression, maybe trying too hard at times to be a young Deforest Kelly and to those who doubted Simon Pegg could pull off Scotty for the whole film – you’re wrong!

Then there’s the plot. It’s here that Abrams shows the rabbit up his sleeve. This is not just a prequel, oh no. Those who are familiar with Abrams’s other projects (Lost, Fringe, Cloverfield etc) should know better than to expect mere prequels and simple storylines. No, this involves {holds breath} an alternate universe. It’s such a simple concept and one that is used a million times in Star Trek already, but it’s done in such a way that it opens the page for the story to be fresh and new. It means the characters could do anything, be anything. With this one move the film releases its ties to the past while still staying faithful to the much-loved series (and trust me, it’s more faithful than you might first think, right down to the end scenes).

Of course, there are always going to be some errors in judgement or pitfalls, you get the feeling that Urban tries too hard for that Bones impression and THAT music is missing from the start of the film (how dare they!). The plot doesn’t really let up enough to develop character beyond the initial half hour of introductions and the whole ‘red matter’ is explained away all too simply for the Star Trek universe (where are the complicated chemical names?) wrapped in a simple plot with little in the way of sci-fi overtones. But who cares when it feels so right?

Star Trek is a sight to behold, the detail, the explosions, the new bridge of the Enterprise. It looks good, sounds good and most of all it feels good. Abrams has done the impossible and the franchise is all the better for it.

9/10
Mon 11/05/09 at 09:59
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Star Trek. A name which some sci-fi fans swoon over, a sacred franchise that shall not be tampered with. It must have involved a fair bit of trepidation then for JJ Abrams to tackle the franchise head on by completely turning it on its head.

Any lesser director would suggest a new crew and a different era, a next-next Generation as it were, but Abrams has taken the herculean task on his shoulders of bringing us a new cast playing some of the most iconic roles in sci-fi history. It’s brave, bold and most importantly; it pays off.

Why does it work? Well, firstly because of the cast. Chris Pine, the new Kirk, is great, despite the plot trying to make us hate his initial ‘space-brat’ character. He makes the part his own without tripping over the obvious clichés of William Shatner-esque old Kirk. Zachary Quinto seems to have been born to play young spock, with Nimoy going on record as being suitably impressed with his protégé. Karl Urban does his best Bones impression, maybe trying too hard at times to be a young Deforest Kelly and to those who doubted Simon Pegg could pull off Scotty for the whole film – you’re wrong!

Then there’s the plot. It’s here that Abrams shows the rabbit up his sleeve. This is not just a prequel, oh no. Those who are familiar with Abrams’s other projects (Lost, Fringe, Cloverfield etc) should know better than to expect mere prequels and simple storylines. No, this involves {holds breath} an alternate universe. It’s such a simple concept and one that is used a million times in Star Trek already, but it’s done in such a way that it opens the page for the story to be fresh and new. It means the characters could do anything, be anything. With this one move the film releases its ties to the past while still staying faithful to the much-loved series (and trust me, it’s more faithful than you might first think, right down to the end scenes).

Of course, there are always going to be some errors in judgement or pitfalls, you get the feeling that Urban tries too hard for that Bones impression and THAT music is missing from the start of the film (how dare they!). The plot doesn’t really let up enough to develop character beyond the initial half hour of introductions and the whole ‘red matter’ is explained away all too simply for the Star Trek universe (where are the complicated chemical names?) wrapped in a simple plot with little in the way of sci-fi overtones. But who cares when it feels so right?

Star Trek is a sight to behold, the detail, the explosions, the new bridge of the Enterprise. It looks good, sounds good and most of all it feels good. Abrams has done the impossible and the franchise is all the better for it.

9/10
Mon 11/05/09 at 12:50
Regular
"How Ironic"
Posts: 4,312
Nice review pb :)
Mon 11/05/09 at 15:00
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Thanks Chris.

Have you seen/are you going to see the film?
Mon 11/05/09 at 16:33
Regular
"How Ironic"
Posts: 4,312
I'm not particularly a big fan of star trek, seeing as i haven't really watched the series, so i haven't considered seeing the film. But it'll be one of them series where i'll watch an episode, and be instantly hooked. That's what happened when i watched Buffy the Vampire Slayer anyway. Then again, William Shatner isn't as hot as Sarah Michelle Gellar....
Mon 11/05/09 at 17:14
Regular
Posts: 15,681
No, but Jadzia Dax is...Seven of Nine not too bad either :P

As this is set before the original series, I don't think you'd need to see the series before watching it - you'd just understand some of the references a bit better...

Nice review PB! No spoilers yet still detailed enough.

Makes me want to see if even more now!
Mon 11/05/09 at 20:46
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Thanks Edgy, and you're right, despite all the obvious fan references to TOS, Enterprise et al it is still very watchable by anyone who hasn't ever seen a Star Trek.

I'm tempted to go watch it again, only the £7 entry fee stands in my way!
Tue 12/05/09 at 11:20
Staff Moderator
"Show Me Your Moves"
Posts: 2,255
You definitely don't need to be a fan of the series to enjoy this, I went with 2 other people who had never seen Star Trek in their lives their only knowledge was of references that have made it into the 'mainstream' and they both enjoyed it as much as me.

I should be going again this week with another mate who couldn't make it on Friday. Love my unlimited card during the summer!
Tue 12/05/09 at 11:43
Regular
"THFC"
Posts: 4,488
ButchML wrote:
> Love my unlimited card during the summer!

Amen - i may go watch it again with my mates, i went with my girlfriend so will be interesting to see other people's perspective on the film.

Need to check what else is on and go watch that, i always enjoy going for something to eat then going to the cinema in the summer, makes for a nice evening!
Mon 18/05/09 at 11:08
Regular
Posts: 15,681
I've seen Star Trek now so for those who don't mind spoilers, my review is hidden below...

Show Spoiler

9/10

*I could have mentioned everything PB did but there would be no point in repetition :)
Tue 19/05/09 at 10:25
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Nice summing up Edgy. Completely agree with what you've said and spotted all those references too.

The bit about

Show Spoiler

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Easy and free service!
I think it's fab that you provide an easy-to-follow service, and even better that it's free...!
Cerrie
My website looks tremendous!
Fantastic site, easy to follow, simple guides... impressed with whole package. My website looks tremendous. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to set this up, Freeola helps you step-by-step.
Susan

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Close Feedback

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.