The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> As for common sense in these days of H&S and form filling
> madness,it doesn't exist in my experience.Thinking about it,maybe
> the Police didn't want to deal with this as it would have meant
> someone doing hours of paperwork ?.Whatever,I still feel it
> should have been logged incase whoever was responsible decides
> that they rather enjoy their new hobby.
Hmm such an incident should have been logged onto the intelligence system, there might not be much to be put onto it but like you said potentially a person who hacks off dogs' heads could then step it up. I would have thought the police would have wanted to have any intelligence about body parts being severed off of anything at the moment. I don't know which county you live in but in Hertfordshire at the moment we've got someone going around leaving body parts in lay-bys. Obviously it's highly unlikely they'd be linked but you never know right?
Also just on the side when you report an incident you're fully entitled to ask for a log number as it forces their hand and a log will have to be made.
> As for common sense in these days of H&S and form filling
> madness,it doesn't exist in my experience.Thinking about it,maybe
> the Police didn't want to deal with this as it would have meant
> someone doing hours of paperwork ?.Whatever,I still feel it
> should have been logged incase whoever was responsible decides
> that they rather enjoy their new hobby.
You'll probably find that police believe they shouldnt be dealing with it anyway. Now if they'd had a report of a stolen dog, then its theft and thats their jurisdiction. I think the vast majority of animal cruelty prosecutions are still brought by the RSPCA I'm surprised they didnt point you in the direction of the RSPCA already actually as they deal with animal remains removal too. But again another organisation that wont want to do anything unless they can help it.
Even if the poor animal was already dead.Why would someone feel it necessary to hack its head off then dump it ?.I would class that as an act which should cause some degree of concern.
As for common sense in these days of H&S and form filling madness,it doesn't exist in my experience.Thinking about it,maybe the Police didn't want to deal with this as it would have meant someone doing hours of paperwork ?.Whatever,I still feel it should have been logged incase whoever was responsible decides that they rather enjoy their new hobby.
> Yeah,that's what would have thought as well.Can assure you its
> not happened in this instance.The Officer which attended did not
> even give this an incident number,let alone crime it.Thinking
> about it I may inform the RSPCA in the morning,see what their
> spin on it is.Personally I have been disgusted by the whole
> episode.
Fortunately, I think I am 'far older than you' Pete, but unfortunately I have to agree with you. The problem exists with today's H&S regulations which seem to be implemented by a complete moron based somewhere in Europe. I have to change 'practices' daily, because the moron has implemented another regulation. Common sense doesn't exist any more - if it did, you would be sued or jailed for life:-D
Anyway, seems a bit of run-around you've been getting and I'd certainly be a bit peeved in your position (let alone a bit disturbed at the discovery of a severed dog head). However, I imiagine it's something no-one encounters on a regular basis, so I can understand the confusion (but taking the head then bringing it back seems a bit stupid... Why couldn't the police keep hold if it and pass it on to the appropriate people...?)
Or am I missing something procedural from a Police point of view?