Viewing Thread:
"These films... any good?"

Have been thinking of buying these movies on DVD:

1. 28 Days Later
2. Deathwatch
3. Reign of Fire


Are any of them actually worth it?

28 Days Later is worth renting, not buying. It's OK, but wasn't as great as I thought it was going to be, but it does still manage to rise above most British dross that's around at the moment.
Not sure about the other two, though Reign of Fire looks like a carefree mindless action flick, which is a good thing.

WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> 1. 28 Days Later - Yes. Big dumb fun.
> 2. Deathwatch - No. Billy Elliot meets Ghostwatch
> 3. Reign of Fire - Dont know but dragons.

28 Days Later and Deathwatch are both class, I'd definently recommend them, don't know about Reign of Fire though, never heard of or seen it.

28 days later is class

MoJoJoJo wrote:
> Meh, Reign Of Fire wasn't that bad. Just don't expect anything
> amazing. Worth a rent, don't bother buying it.

Id try the above for Reign of Fire, was ok; worth the rent.


Borat Sagdiyev wrote:
> i thought 28 days was v.good

True, top class british film. Watch it now!


MoJoJoJo wrote:
> Don't know about Deathwatch. Heard it was pants.

Me too, so wouldn't know. Rent again would be my option.

Meh, Reign Of Fire wasn't that bad. Just don't expect anything amazing. Worth a rent, don't bother buying it.

Haven't seen 28 Days Later yet. My brother has it on DVD, I'll get around to it.

Don't know about Deathwatch. Heard it was pants.

gamezfreak wrote:
> No breasts.
>
> Just a cheesy slow motion scene where a man takes his top off.

So...........breasts then.

Anyone who judges a film by the special effects clearly has no idea of a good film. Not that I have seen any of these.

Donnie Darko is a great film.

No breasts.

Just a cheesy slow motion scene where a man takes his top off.

gamezfreak wrote:
> Instead of buying RoF, rent it. It is'nt worth really anything, but if
> your curious about it.....
>
> Acting = poor
> Plot = poor
> Special effects = awful
> Verdict = Crap

breasts ?