The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Excellent comedy.
Bloody cheered me up no end.
Especially the Ace Ventura like bits. Man I want another Ventura film.
Anyways, this film is great, its not going to stimulate your mind, it actually has a sort of plot, and teaches people not to try and play God or pray for no reason.
As comedies in this age go, this is a 9/10
B E A YOU TIFUL.
Bloody cheered me up no end.
Especially the Ace Ventura like bits. Man I want another Ventura film.
Anyways, this film is great, its not going to stimulate your mind, it actually has a sort of plot, and teaches people not to try and play God or pray for no reason.
As comedies in this age go, this is a 9/10
B E A YOU TIFUL.
Page:
Pop. Cos some hoe thinks he got their first.
Its superb.
It's going to be fantastic and probably one of the biggest comedy hits of the year! I wish I could blow at a girl and make her skirt fly up like on the advert of this film!!! Class film.
pring
pring
...Jason Lee and Carrey. Now THAT would be good.
pb wrote:
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Jackie
> Chan as a lead character leaves the film a bit empty
>
> I'll pretend you didn't say that. Tucker on his own would make the
> film annoying, oh and what would be the point? There's a thing called
> being subtle and funny you know.
I think the two contrast well together but in films where Jackie Chain is the lead character the acting itself isn't funny - the funny bits are the fight scenes. In Rush Hour Tucker and Chan bounce off each other and make it funny but with chan as a sole lead character he cannot do this.
"Yeah, you have a point Kyz"
Thank you
> Kyz22 wrote:
> Jackie
> Chan as a lead character leaves the film a bit empty
>
> I'll pretend you didn't say that. Tucker on his own would make the
> film annoying, oh and what would be the point? There's a thing called
> being subtle and funny you know.
I think the two contrast well together but in films where Jackie Chain is the lead character the acting itself isn't funny - the funny bits are the fight scenes. In Rush Hour Tucker and Chan bounce off each other and make it funny but with chan as a sole lead character he cannot do this.
"Yeah, you have a point Kyz"
Thank you
Tucker is annoying.
He should just look at the camera and beg the audience to laugh.
Oh yeah he does that.
He should just look at the camera and beg the audience to laugh.
Oh yeah he does that.
Kyz22 wrote:
> Jackie
> Chan as a lead character leaves the film a bit empty
I'll pretend you didn't say that. Tucker on his own would make the film annoying, oh and what would be the point? There's a thing called being subtle and funny you know.
> Jackie
> Chan as a lead character leaves the film a bit empty
I'll pretend you didn't say that. Tucker on his own would make the film annoying, oh and what would be the point? There's a thing called being subtle and funny you know.
I saw the feature legnth trailer in the cinema when I went to see The Matrix. It really does look good. I can't say I'm a huge fan of Jim Carrey, but I'm enticed.
Jason Lee.
Kyz22 wrote:
> Carey is the funniest actor of our time, followed by Chris Tucker.
> That would be a brilliant lead cast for a film.
Nah, after Carey it would be Eddie Murphy. He has been off the boil for a few years now but hell Beverly Hills Cop was funny.
For visual humour I also really like David Hyde-Pierce, Niles from Frasier, he is great.
> Carey is the funniest actor of our time, followed by Chris Tucker.
> That would be a brilliant lead cast for a film.
Nah, after Carey it would be Eddie Murphy. He has been off the boil for a few years now but hell Beverly Hills Cop was funny.
For visual humour I also really like David Hyde-Pierce, Niles from Frasier, he is great.
Page: