The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Everyone likes porn until they see their 19 year old daughter being clubbed up the ass on the internet.
Personally, I think we should dig a dirty great big hole and drop porn in and cover it up with a bulldozer. Then breath in the fresh air from higher mountains.
Personally, I think we should dig a dirty great big hole and drop porn in and cover it up with a bulldozer. Then breath in the fresh air from higher mountains.
Page:
I think porn is ok, (not that i'm interrested in it) as long as it is clearly labelled 18 or over, I think its wrong to have little kids accidently stumble upon it, by typing in disneyland.'net' or something...
Unless the people on the site have been forced to do it, or not told what it is for.
Mr. No shoes
Unless the people on the site have been forced to do it, or not told what it is for.
Mr. No shoes
PORN comprises of far too much of our internet, and a great proportion are unsafe. that's why i stay away from dodgy stuff like that at all costs....
locky1133 wrote:
> But are they not persectued because they are different. I don't
> condone the actions some take, not at all, but surely a hundred years
> ago people would have said the same about homosexual men. In a hundred
> years, paedophiles will be accepted, but their actions will not.
I don't see that happening. If recent history tells us anything it is that history is not repeating itself, nor are we as a society becoming more tolerant. Not that we should tolerate pedophiles, but I'm talkig in a general sense.
Part of the acceptance by more people of homosexuality links to a an erosion of religious belief in the West. In countries like India, Pakistan, Iran etc there is no acceptance of it. Ironically many pedophiles have found a home in the various Churches of the West such as the Catholic Church.
Nothing is impossible in 100 years, but in all likelihood a system which legalised paedophilia would create a massive anti-movement, which would destroy that system, and those who created it.
Back to porn though, if the internet had led to greater openess about sex etc in real life then that would be good, instead it hasn't and in public most are still total prudes. Hence I don't think the internet has done anything other than create a society looking at porn in secret.
> But are they not persectued because they are different. I don't
> condone the actions some take, not at all, but surely a hundred years
> ago people would have said the same about homosexual men. In a hundred
> years, paedophiles will be accepted, but their actions will not.
I don't see that happening. If recent history tells us anything it is that history is not repeating itself, nor are we as a society becoming more tolerant. Not that we should tolerate pedophiles, but I'm talkig in a general sense.
Part of the acceptance by more people of homosexuality links to a an erosion of religious belief in the West. In countries like India, Pakistan, Iran etc there is no acceptance of it. Ironically many pedophiles have found a home in the various Churches of the West such as the Catholic Church.
Nothing is impossible in 100 years, but in all likelihood a system which legalised paedophilia would create a massive anti-movement, which would destroy that system, and those who created it.
Back to porn though, if the internet had led to greater openess about sex etc in real life then that would be good, instead it hasn't and in public most are still total prudes. Hence I don't think the internet has done anything other than create a society looking at porn in secret.
I don't want to say more through fear of being mis-understood but Monkey made some good points. Skimmed over some good points, anyway.
Lindgren wrote:
> You see paedophilia as natural? Tell that to the poor kids who suffer
> because of paedophiles. Sexual activities are all well and good unless
> someone is being hurt or abused by it.
But are they not persectued because they are different. I don't condone the actions some take, not at all, but surely a hundred years ago people would have said the same about homosexual men. In a hundred years, paedophiles will be accepted, but their actions will not.
> You see paedophilia as natural? Tell that to the poor kids who suffer
> because of paedophiles. Sexual activities are all well and good unless
> someone is being hurt or abused by it.
But are they not persectued because they are different. I don't condone the actions some take, not at all, but surely a hundred years ago people would have said the same about homosexual men. In a hundred years, paedophiles will be accepted, but their actions will not.
Lil Ginge wrote:
> My lesbian friend offered me 'lesbian porn' today
Can I observe and maybe take part?
Because there's this assignment I need to do and it requires me to observe and take part in deep and meaningless experiances...
;)
> My lesbian friend offered me 'lesbian porn' today
Can I observe and maybe take part?
Because there's this assignment I need to do and it requires me to observe and take part in deep and meaningless experiances...
;)
Porn: lots is enough.
End of debate, I win, collect all prize money.
End of debate, I win, collect all prize money.
Yes when it comes to you and when you get a girlfriend and start talking about sex you won't have a clue what you don't like and do like.... so you say 'jackoff' is dirty it actually prepares you when this happens.
Mess wrote:
> You know people watch porn to jack off. And that's just dirty.
You're not serious?! Are you?!
> You know people watch porn to jack off. And that's just dirty.
You're not serious?! Are you?!
Mess wrote:
> You know people watch porn to jack off. And that's just dirty.
i thought they watched porn to compare body hair patterns
> You know people watch porn to jack off. And that's just dirty.
i thought they watched porn to compare body hair patterns
Page: