The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A vote for El Hulkstré is a vote for intelligence and self-impotence.
I'm the only candidate worthy of this status, bar the grammatically incorrect philistines I've seen suggested.
Vote Hulkstré, you know you want to.
I'm the only candidate worthy of this status, bar the grammatically incorrect philistines I've seen suggested.
Vote Hulkstré, you know you want to.
Page:
Vote Crazycol! wrote:
> I don't reply in every thread.
>
> Vote CrazyCol!
Yes you do, and nobody will vote for you because all you do is litter the forums with your worthless self promotion.
> I don't reply in every thread.
>
> Vote CrazyCol!
Yes you do, and nobody will vote for you because all you do is litter the forums with your worthless self promotion.
Did I say that? No. I said you spam about in in EVERY THREAD YOU REPLY TO. Not every thread, just the ones you reply to, in fact, you even proved my point by doing exactly what I said you do in that very last message.
El Hulkstré wrote:
> I made a solitary post detailing wy wishes and reasons for becoming a
> notable, found out newbies can't be elected, and so withdrew my
> campaign. I did not insist upon spamming in every thread I reply to
> about it.
I don't reply in every thread.
Vote CrazyCol!
> I made a solitary post detailing wy wishes and reasons for becoming a
> notable, found out newbies can't be elected, and so withdrew my
> campaign. I did not insist upon spamming in every thread I reply to
> about it.
I don't reply in every thread.
Vote CrazyCol!
El Hulkstré wrote:
> I made a solitary post detailing wy wishes and reasons for becoming a
> notable, found out newbies can't be elected, and so withdrew my
> campaign. I did not insist upon spamming in every thread I reply to
> about it.
my wishes*
> I made a solitary post detailing wy wishes and reasons for becoming a
> notable, found out newbies can't be elected, and so withdrew my
> campaign. I did not insist upon spamming in every thread I reply to
> about it.
my wishes*
I made a solitary post detailing wy wishes and reasons for becoming a notable, found out newbies can't be elected, and so withdrew my campaign. I did not insist upon spamming in every thread I reply to about it.
El Hulkstré wrote:
> I've now just had a loook around the forums, and all I can see
> regarding you is people accusing you of making racist remarks, and a
> few completely pointless andretarded topics started in the Life &
> Everything forum.
>
> I've also noticed people calling you a newbie only days ago... since
> you've obviously only become a regular today or yesterday, adn have
> done 335 posts altogether, I doubt you've produced anything of use in
> these forums. You haven't won any Gameaday prizes either, which seems
> to be another way of assesing a members quality of posting/reviewing.
Many older regulars havn't won Gameadays either, how come you was campaigning earlier aswell?
> I've now just had a loook around the forums, and all I can see
> regarding you is people accusing you of making racist remarks, and a
> few completely pointless andretarded topics started in the Life &
> Everything forum.
>
> I've also noticed people calling you a newbie only days ago... since
> you've obviously only become a regular today or yesterday, adn have
> done 335 posts altogether, I doubt you've produced anything of use in
> these forums. You haven't won any Gameaday prizes either, which seems
> to be another way of assesing a members quality of posting/reviewing.
Many older regulars havn't won Gameadays either, how come you was campaigning earlier aswell?
I've now just had a loook around the forums, and all I can see regarding you is people accusing you of making racist remarks, and a few completely pointless andretarded topics started in the Life & Everything forum.
I've also noticed people calling you a newbie only days ago... since you've obviously only become a regular today or yesterday, adn have done 335 posts altogether, I doubt you've produced anything of use in these forums. You haven't won any Gameaday prizes either, which seems to be another way of assesing a members quality of posting/reviewing.
I've also noticed people calling you a newbie only days ago... since you've obviously only become a regular today or yesterday, adn have done 335 posts altogether, I doubt you've produced anything of use in these forums. You haven't won any Gameaday prizes either, which seems to be another way of assesing a members quality of posting/reviewing.
El Hulkstré wrote:
> Considering this retard has now changed his name to include 'Vote' I'd
> say I am a more worthy candidate for the positon, because of my
> vocabulary and grammatical skills. However I accept that newbies
> cannot be voted for, so I will stop my campaign. Perhaps next time
> you will feel compelled to vote for me, since you know it's the right
> thing to do.
>
> Crazycol: I haven't been here for very long, but I have to say that
> I've only ever seen you campaign for votes... therefore you've done
> nothing to actually warrant a vote. If I was eligible to vote, it
> certainly wouldn't be to vote for you.
Exactly, you havn't been here for long, so how could you of seen me d over stuff?
> Considering this retard has now changed his name to include 'Vote' I'd
> say I am a more worthy candidate for the positon, because of my
> vocabulary and grammatical skills. However I accept that newbies
> cannot be voted for, so I will stop my campaign. Perhaps next time
> you will feel compelled to vote for me, since you know it's the right
> thing to do.
>
> Crazycol: I haven't been here for very long, but I have to say that
> I've only ever seen you campaign for votes... therefore you've done
> nothing to actually warrant a vote. If I was eligible to vote, it
> certainly wouldn't be to vote for you.
Exactly, you havn't been here for long, so how could you of seen me d over stuff?
Considering this retard has now changed his name to include 'Vote' I'd say I am a more worthy candidate for the positon, because of my vocabulary and grammatical skills. However I accept that newbies cannot be voted for, so I will stop my campaign. Perhaps next time you will feel compelled to vote for me, since you know it's the right thing to do.
Crazycol: I haven't been here for very long, but I have to say that I've only ever seen you campaign for votes... therefore you've done nothing to actually warrant a vote. If I was eligible to vote, it certainly wouldn't be to vote for you.
Crazycol: I haven't been here for very long, but I have to say that I've only ever seen you campaign for votes... therefore you've done nothing to actually warrant a vote. If I was eligible to vote, it certainly wouldn't be to vote for you.
Memorandum wrote:
> You're both equally stupid.
Hey, does that mean we are both quite low stupidity equal?
Vote Crazycol!
> You're both equally stupid.
Hey, does that mean we are both quite low stupidity equal?
Vote Crazycol!
Page: