Viewing Thread:
"Are you sure this is Scary Movie 3?"

http://movies.go.com/movies/ (SPACE) S/scarymovie3_2002/index.html

Leslie Nielsen?
Charlie Sheen?
Kevin Smith - Executive producer?

"The Scary Movie spoof franchise continues with the third installment, Lord of the Brooms, which will mock movie franchises Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, and Star Wars. It will follow the adventures of an orphan on a magical quest to protect the world from dark forces."

I predict good things. It has to be better than the second one though...

Yeah, pretty old now though :|

I was reading around. And you say its based on the Lord of the Rings and other movies etc.

I found a picture of the poster for it. And they're saying it's based on The Ring and Signs too..

http://cgi.horror-asylum.com/news/scarym3c.jpg

Well, there's the picture of the poster I found.. Not sure if it's the official one. But that's what it says.

Blank wrote:
> The Mummy isn't even the slightest bit good. Every aspect is terrible,
> except some of the CGI.

The CGI of the Scorpion King in Mummy Returns is total cack.

Scary movie was a great film, but Scary Movie 2 was...well, everybody knows. 3 looks to be the best of the bunch. Even without the lord of cinema spoofing Leslie Nielsen, there's KEVIN SMITH.

I thought the mummy would be utter balls, but I actually really enjoyed it.

Big dumb fun.

Scary Movie 2 on the other hand was mainly rubbish.

The Mummy isn't even the slightest bit good. Every aspect is terrible, except some of the CGI.

I watched Scary Movie when it came onto video. Suffice to say the invoice i sent the movie studio for my time being wasted is still unpaid.

The Mummy was pretty decent, unless you're referring to the Karloff version :D

Also, Scary Movie 4 and 5 are penciled in :|

I've seen number two only. It's currently tied with The Mummy for "Worst film of all time".

I meant: It has to be better than the second one anyway..