Viewing Thread:
"Magazine Covers (File under books)"

This is just a thought I was having about magazines last night.

On the cover of men's magazines you get pictures of women.

On the cover of women's magazines you get pictures of women.

On the cover of gay women's magazines you get pictures of women.

On the cover of gay men's magazines you get pictures of men.


Is this proof that only gay men actually find men attractive?

It was GQ. Thanks that was bugging me not remebering the name.

english_bloke wrote:
> But actualy the highest selling copy of one mens mag (cant remeber
> which) had David Beckham on the cover.

He has been on the front of GQ and Esquire.

I want to be a woman now.

Actually, no I don't.

monkey_man wrote:
> Or they all hump fish?

They do tend to look kinda happy don't they (unlike the fish...)

They also had "bikinis around the world" but that's another story.

On the front cover of the National Geographic they had a "bikin's around the world special". I took it home and did my impression of a humpback for about 10 minutes before the urge to revert to my favourite, the sperm whale, became too strong.

It wasn't entirely necessary to shout "thar she blows" I suppose.

I think it is because most mens mags are used for different perposes then womens. Mags such as FHM have some good articles in them and 18's plus do read most of them, but I think the bulk of there sales are from 14-15 year old's who just flick through.

But actualy the highest selling copy of one mens mag (cant remeber which) had David Beckham on the cover.

Or they all hump fish?

Fishing magazines have pictures of fish on the front...but also men holding the fish. Therefore all fisherman are gay??..

I can appreciate how someone who was into body-building could look at a picture of a man, or woman, all pumped and oiled as a benchmark for the physical shape they were trying to achieve.

Wrestling on the other hand is pure homoerotica.