Viewing Thread:
"What you get when you follow the bush......."

Okay bloody Mr Blair decides to follow whatever Mr Bush says, yes September 11th was a disaster but why does he have to go for revenge straight away? What if Iraq has no weapons.
Now we pay for following the americans in the case for war, and we are on alert for a terroist attack thanks to them.
Why drag the UK public into it when we are against it?
Even the US government has given out a list of items their citizens should buy, but i don't want to dive as low as them.
Why can't Mr Blair use common sense and think of a way of peace first then be like bloody Mr Bush and insist... we must kill whoever we think is a threat because we say so.

They had it in their mind a year ago.. but they had to get teh backing of some countries first and we got dragged in quickly.

§n][pe® wrote:
> Okay bloody Mr Blair decides to follow whatever Mr Bush says, yes
> September 11th was a disaster but why does he have to go for revenge
> straight away?

--

Yes, they are going in straight away without thinking. September 11 happened, and the Bush administration prepared for war on Iraq without hesitation. Bang, 1 year and 5 months later, they're almost there. Straight away...you cretin.

mikelar wrote:
> Or what if us and the yanks go in there, bust some heads and find an
> arsenal of super-toxic deadly weapons with a map which has a skull and
> cross bones doodle drawn on it right over Britian. huh? HUH?!


they'll realise they just raided a 5 years birthday party

lol @ mikelar

*high five*

Or what if us and the yanks go in there, bust some heads and find an arsenal of super-toxic deadly weapons with a map which has a skull and cross bones doodle drawn on it right over Britian. huh? HUH?!

§n][pe® wrote:
> Jeez its just a pain having this much crap when other countries are
> standing back and not standing like a complete idiot alongside the US
> and are less alerted to a terroist attack but since Mr Blair stands by
> The Bush for war what can we do?

I mean less likely than us and the US .

Remember there is another side to it all though.

What if they did go for the peaceful option and then the UK was attacked in an act of terrorism.

Would your views remain the same then?

Jeez its just a pain having this much crap when other countries are standing back and not standing like a complete idiot alongside the US and are less alerted to a terroist attack but since Mr Blair stands by The Bush for war what can we do?

Blair can if he wants, it's not us that'll lose our position as Prime Minister.

Blimey.