The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was just looking through the extras of Back To The Future and I watched the outtakes and there's a really great one. When George McFly says "gimme a milk - make it chocolate", the guy serving him makes it slide along the counter, but it slides off the counter and onto the floor. Cracked me the hell up.
Gonna watch BTTF 2 tonight.
BTTF2 - the most overplayed film in the Sci-Fi channel's history :P
Gonna watch BTTF 2 tonight.
BTTF2 - the most overplayed film in the Sci-Fi channel's history :P
Page:
Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
>
> no, but your gay.
>
> Not, 'you're' gay. If you're going to insult me, at least get the
> grammar correct! :P
That just shows how gay you are.
> froots wrote:
> Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
>
> no, but your gay.
>
> Not, 'you're' gay. If you're going to insult me, at least get the
> grammar correct! :P
That just shows how gay you are.
froots wrote:
> Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
>
> no, but your gay.
Not, 'you're' gay. If you're going to insult me, at least get the grammar correct! :P
> Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
>
> no, but your gay.
Not, 'you're' gay. If you're going to insult me, at least get the grammar correct! :P
Quality films, quality DVD.
Nuff said.
Nuff said.
AliBoy wrote:
> Got the DVD boxset for Christmas.
> Some excellent Outtakes, like the one where he is acting like a
> mexican/latino in the school.
I also got it for christmas, I am a huge fan of the movies.
> Got the DVD boxset for Christmas.
> Some excellent Outtakes, like the one where he is acting like a
> mexican/latino in the school.
I also got it for christmas, I am a huge fan of the movies.
Armatige Shanks wrote:
> I dont know how true this is - It was one of the comments for the
> BackToTheFuture boxset from the Amacon.com website, and we all know
> how dodgy they are... Just thought it was kinda interesting...
>
> 'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
I think I know what it's relating to - the guy has magnafied the problem slightly. The problem is only in literally two or three scenes and it sounds more like a clipping problem i.e. every film's negative is shot with a little extra at the top and bottom you're not supposed to see, but it covers a bad projectionist's back. This is why you often get the boom in shot - not because of the camera operator/director/boom operator messing up, but because the guy in the projection room hasn't lined the image and the screen up propperly. A couple of reputable souces explained the problem as their being too much in the top and bottom in two or three scenes i.e. the person doing the mastering for the DVD messed up and included the whole image in the problem scenes.
> I dont know how true this is - It was one of the comments for the
> BackToTheFuture boxset from the Amacon.com website, and we all know
> how dodgy they are... Just thought it was kinda interesting...
>
> 'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
I think I know what it's relating to - the guy has magnafied the problem slightly. The problem is only in literally two or three scenes and it sounds more like a clipping problem i.e. every film's negative is shot with a little extra at the top and bottom you're not supposed to see, but it covers a bad projectionist's back. This is why you often get the boom in shot - not because of the camera operator/director/boom operator messing up, but because the guy in the projection room hasn't lined the image and the screen up propperly. A couple of reputable souces explained the problem as their being too much in the top and bottom in two or three scenes i.e. the person doing the mastering for the DVD messed up and included the whole image in the problem scenes.
Flux wrote:
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
no, but your gay.
> froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
>
> You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
no, but your gay.
Stryke wrote:
> Heavy.
Another boring post from Stryke...
*Snore*
> Heavy.
Another boring post from Stryke...
*Snore*
Armatige Shanks wrote:
> I dont know how true this is - It was one of the comments for the
> BackToTheFuture boxset from the Amacon.com website, and we all know
> how dodgy they are... Just thought it was kinda interesting...
>
> 'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
> Reviewer: Paul Mular from San Carlos, CA USA
> Universal Home Video has admitted that they mistakenly matted the Pan
> & Scan version of Back to the Future 2 & 3 to look widescreen.
> A corrected version is in the works and will be released sometime in
> February 2003. Customers are instructed to return the DVD Discs ONLY,
> keep the case, to Universal Home Video for a replacement copy!'
I think that's bull.
> I dont know how true this is - It was one of the comments for the
> BackToTheFuture boxset from the Amacon.com website, and we all know
> how dodgy they are... Just thought it was kinda interesting...
>
> 'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
> Reviewer: Paul Mular from San Carlos, CA USA
> Universal Home Video has admitted that they mistakenly matted the Pan
> & Scan version of Back to the Future 2 & 3 to look widescreen.
> A corrected version is in the works and will be released sometime in
> February 2003. Customers are instructed to return the DVD Discs ONLY,
> keep the case, to Universal Home Video for a replacement copy!'
I think that's bull.
froots wrote:
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
> bah, ive got the trilogy on DVD, and you get out takes for all three
> films, and deleted scenes for all of them as well, yey!
You're a leetle slow, aren't you?
I dont know how true this is - It was one of the comments for the BackToTheFuture boxset from the Amacon.com website, and we all know how dodgy they are... Just thought it was kinda interesting...
'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
Reviewer: Paul Mular from San Carlos, CA USA
Universal Home Video has admitted that they mistakenly matted the Pan & Scan version of Back to the Future 2 & 3 to look widescreen. A corrected version is in the works and will be released sometime in February 2003. Customers are instructed to return the DVD Discs ONLY, keep the case, to Universal Home Video for a replacement copy!'
'BEWARE OF THE FALSE WIDESCREEN RELEASE!, December 19, 2002
Reviewer: Paul Mular from San Carlos, CA USA
Universal Home Video has admitted that they mistakenly matted the Pan & Scan version of Back to the Future 2 & 3 to look widescreen. A corrected version is in the works and will be released sometime in February 2003. Customers are instructed to return the DVD Discs ONLY, keep the case, to Universal Home Video for a replacement copy!'
Page: