Viewing Thread:
"Perfect Dark V Time Spliters!"

Ok this is mainly to all those who have played both (because there is no point in arguing if you haven't played both)

I have played both and i think byfar perfect dark is better what do you think?

Ok this is mainly to all those who have played both (because there is no point in arguing if you haven't played both)

I have played both and i think byfar perfect dark is better what do you think?

Why is Perfect Dark better?

I haven't played Timesplitters, by the way.

don't no way, maybe too many aliens!
I didn't mind Elvis at all! Maian SOS is my fav level!

How can you say that without an explanation??? And the graphics are obviously better as it's on PS2.
Typical newbies. He probably thinks he's gonna win with that.

Perfect Dark easily wins in my opinion.
I found Timesplitters extremely annoying to control, aim has to be so precise that you can miss with a shotgun from point blank range ! Plus while your messing around aiming with the awkward controls, your getting shot to your component molecules.

I also found the characters in it annoying. Sorry Ant, but PS2 graphics didn't save this from being one of the smelliest games i've played in a while.

And yes i have played both games.

I personally enjoy TimeSplitters, though the control system does take some getting used to.

As I've said before, it's down to personal opinion, that's all.

I mean, year after year after year, FIFA gets slated... and yes, it does have major flaws. But that doesn't stop it selling millions of copies, so obviously a lot of people enjoy it.

I like both Perfect Dark and Time Spliters as they are both as good as each other.

I've heard that Timesplitters is meant to play like a Perfect Dark deathmatch (but faster with better graphics).
I personally prefer the stealth and mission objectives and sniping of Perfect Darks Solo. I suppose it's down to taste!

Ant, Timesplitters isn't better just because it's on the PS2, it's a big console but it's not at it's full potential yet, in a years time this game will look very simple.
Perfect Dark is using the most of the N64's power! it has a huge 256mb cart and has no bites of memory left!
Goldeneye was only using 99mbs of it's 128mb cart, thats not much when you think that there are 500mb carts out now.
In a years time games will be more advanced than they are now and you will see a vast difference.

ant said

How can you say that without an explanation??? And the graphics are obviously better as it's on PS2.
Typical newbies. He probably thinks he's gonna win with that.

Ok newbie i don't think so just cause i haven't be posting dosn't mean i am a newbie i ahev been in spieical reserve since like 94 and i have been posting since 98 i just got fed up and then i started again.

i am sorry i haven't been online the past few nights to defend my arguement but i will now.

Ok time spliters may be faster but who wants faster, it dosn't make a game better (who playes pd in turbo mode?)

graphics- i dunno now they could be better than what they are, and graphics don't make a game either (grand theif auto)

now the gameplay pd wins by a mile cause its just way better, it handles better, the guns are wayyyyyy better, and the single player is better,harder and way more fun.

If you have any other arugments then just thrown them cause you haven't played both and until you do you can't say.