The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
OK, this stat is pretty lame so gimme something to use. If I like it, I'll use it.
Page:
Blokey person (;-)) - decided on a permanent tagline yet?
MoJoJoJo wrote:
> Do we win a cookie?
>
> "How big were these t*****s?"
>
> "Nice legs, what time are they open?"
>
> "Do you see?"
>
>
> (El Blokey will get those jokes)
LAAAAAAAME.
Just like Lethal Weapon.
> Do we win a cookie?
>
> "How big were these t*****s?"
>
> "Nice legs, what time are they open?"
>
> "Do you see?"
>
>
> (El Blokey will get those jokes)
LAAAAAAAME.
Just like Lethal Weapon.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and
> you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
>
> ---
>
> But Reddy told us, and he's your goddamn best friend! I think he would
> know, and if he didn't he wouldn't say, would he?!
REDDY, who is REDDY, and i dont even know him.
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and
> you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
>
> ---
>
> But Reddy told us, and he's your goddamn best friend! I think he would
> know, and if he didn't he wouldn't say, would he?!
REDDY, who is REDDY, and i dont even know him.
Lethal Weapon wrote:
> I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and
> you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
---
But Reddy told us, and he's your goddamn best friend! I think he would know, and if he didn't he wouldn't say, would he?!
> I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and
> you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
---
But Reddy told us, and he's your goddamn best friend! I think he would know, and if he didn't he wouldn't say, would he?!
AfroJoe wrote:
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you
> might
> as well save your energy.
>
> ---
>
> It won't make any energy difference in whether I accuse you of being
> someone or not.
>
> I push the Reply Quoting This Message button, I delete the text that
> isn't needed, and I write my reply to your usually stupid previous
> sentence.
>
> Not many trees are going to have to be cut down for that.
>
> And actually, that someone is here, and I'm talking to that someone
> right now. That someone happens to be Reynolds.
I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you
> might
> as well save your energy.
>
> ---
>
> It won't make any energy difference in whether I accuse you of being
> someone or not.
>
> I push the Reply Quoting This Message button, I delete the text that
> isn't needed, and I write my reply to your usually stupid previous
> sentence.
>
> Not many trees are going to have to be cut down for that.
>
> And actually, that someone is here, and I'm talking to that someone
> right now. That someone happens to be Reynolds.
I am not going to argue with you anymore because i know who i am and you dont so there. And i am not reynolds.
Look, Lethal Weapon, I know who you are. You are Reynolds.
Reddy told me. Now just admit that I'm right and stop trying to fight a losing battle, which is what you are doing right now.
You are also Honey_Monster, just for the record.
Reddy told me. Now just admit that I'm right and stop trying to fight a losing battle, which is what you are doing right now.
You are also Honey_Monster, just for the record.
Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you might
> as well save your energy.
---
It won't make any energy difference in whether I accuse you of being someone or not.
I push the Reply Quoting This Message button, I delete the text that isn't needed, and I write my reply to your usually stupid previous sentence.
Not many trees are going to have to be cut down for that.
And actually, that someone is here, and I'm talking to that someone right now. That someone happens to be Reynolds.
> Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you might
> as well save your energy.
---
It won't make any energy difference in whether I accuse you of being someone or not.
I push the Reply Quoting This Message button, I delete the text that isn't needed, and I write my reply to your usually stupid previous sentence.
Not many trees are going to have to be cut down for that.
And actually, that someone is here, and I'm talking to that someone right now. That someone happens to be Reynolds.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
>
> ---
>
> Nope. Sorry.
Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you might as well save your energy.
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
>
> ---
>
> Nope. Sorry.
Well you are going to accuse someone who is not even here so you might as well save your energy.
Lethal Weapon wrote:
> Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
---
Nope. Sorry.
> Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
---
Nope. Sorry.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> "El N00b"
>
> "El Stupid"
>
> they sound like you, LOL.
>
> ---
>
> No, Reynolds, those would describe you.
Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
> Lethal Weapon wrote:
> "El N00b"
>
> "El Stupid"
>
> they sound like you, LOL.
>
> ---
>
> No, Reynolds, those would describe you.
Can i go a week or two without being accused of anyone.
Page: