Viewing Thread:
"Could there not be an easier way to win?"

In GameADay could you not win for the most posts in a day week or month.Then more people would come on to the site to try and with this award of say £25.
I know there are already cheats,chat forum and reveiws but once a month the staff could have a prize for the most posted person of the month or something like that.Posts because if words people would just write spam.

That idea would just create more spam. There is an easier way to win: Write a review, walkthrough and topic, and save it in word. Come on on Christmas day and copy-paste them all in. Only complete nobodies come on properly at Christmas, and it'll only take 10 mintues to post all your entries.

What about the number of posts you have on you thread and pick the highest amount of the day to pick the winner?

If anything needs changing, I believe Prize 3 should be restricted to just walkthroughs, and put up to £50...but that's just my opinion. The system's pretty dang good the way it is.

professor_frink wrote:
> I think changing SR would be bad so lets not.

AGREED

Also a regular could have a couple of accounts and vote to him a couple of times or have a big gang a mates so they all vote for him and he gets £25 for his trouble.

Mandatare wrote:
> professor_frink wrote:
> Sorry I was thinking of if you write 200 words it counts as one
> post.
>
> ummmm, that still wouldn't work well as mass quoting could be used as
> well as there's too much maths involved to change the stats on SR.

All you need to do is quote a big paragraph and some spammer gets another post to his or her name.
I think changing SR would be bad so lets not.

Cubist wrote:
> I think that everytime a notable is elected the winning notable should
> get a £25 GAD :D they have to earn our trust and respect to get
> voted anyway so they truly deserve it because were not going to vote
> for some spammer or anyone like that :D

I agree with that but then i also don't. most notables are voted in because they are respected but others, mentioning no names are voted in due to forums wanting a representitive.

Cubist wrote:
> I think that everytime a notable is elected the winning notable should
> get a £25 GAD :D they have to earn our trust and respect to get
> voted anyway so they truly deserve it because were not going to vote
> for some spammer or anyone like that :D

We will pick someone who helps us and is a good writer I do see your point we should.But I don't think GAD staff will agree but ask them and find out.

professor_frink wrote:
> Sorry I was thinking of if you write 200 words it counts as one post.

ummmm, that still wouldn't work well as mass quoting could be used as well as there's too much maths involved to change the stats on SR.

Mandatare wrote:

> a combo of like only over 200 posts count as one so only good well
> written one's are choosen?
>
> SOrry but what did the last sentence mean? I couldn't understand it.

Sorry I was thinking of if you write 200 words it counts as one post.