The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yah. Odd title I know. But who cares? By the way - The 'game' (yes that is what it is) has a gay lead character, who openly admits it. He is also backed up by a woman who can actualy think for herself, is actualy quite unattractive and also does not wear glasses, even though shes intellignet -and she can even not-get-shot-in-an-odd-Half-Life kinda way.
What an odd game? Perhaps even odder is the fact that it dosen't bother with life, explosions, manipulation, or even try to deal with love or anything like that. It deals with one thing. I have no idea what - Thats for the player to decide. WHAT? The player to think - *shudders* For themselves? What in Gods name is this kind of game? A GAY! Lead character? Non-linearity? Is that possible?
Proably not, but I'm no developer. You decide. Ah! Can't. Ah well. Jus**t join EA and churn out yet another sub-s**tandard PS2 to GC port. Thanks. Thats usual. Normal. You expect £35 for that? Fine! I'll believe the advertising and take it. So what is its a sub-s**tandard game?! Back to the normal world where expectations are met. Easy.
Dooki Moonki Woonki? What kinda title is that? Its NOT a 3-d tactical squad based shooter? WELL WHY ARE YA WASTING MY TIME? We need Blake DuKillers SP OPS Tactical Assault Squad, not this imaginative sh*t.
GET OUTTA MA' OFFICE!
Ah well. Back to the drawing board. Lets scrap that nice idea and replace it with something more ordinary. Lets say.......mini racers around a bedroom, or yet another 3rd/1s**t person shooter - that get this - involves tactical squad communication! WOW! Lets make the lead s**trong, tough and oh so camp, but oh so obviously heterosexual? (I mean 'Serious Sam' Hes a bit, well, camp eh?) Have him backed up with a bus**ty feis**ty s**tupidly attractive (supposedly) woman who can shoot a bad huy through the head and down the next with a crackin' one liner.
Yeah. That oughta do it.
------------
Thank God for Nintendo, Lionhead, Ion Storm and that select few.
What an odd game? Perhaps even odder is the fact that it dosen't bother with life, explosions, manipulation, or even try to deal with love or anything like that. It deals with one thing. I have no idea what - Thats for the player to decide. WHAT? The player to think - *shudders* For themselves? What in Gods name is this kind of game? A GAY! Lead character? Non-linearity? Is that possible?
Proably not, but I'm no developer. You decide. Ah! Can't. Ah well. Jus**t join EA and churn out yet another sub-s**tandard PS2 to GC port. Thanks. Thats usual. Normal. You expect £35 for that? Fine! I'll believe the advertising and take it. So what is its a sub-s**tandard game?! Back to the normal world where expectations are met. Easy.
Dooki Moonki Woonki? What kinda title is that? Its NOT a 3-d tactical squad based shooter? WELL WHY ARE YA WASTING MY TIME? We need Blake DuKillers SP OPS Tactical Assault Squad, not this imaginative sh*t.
GET OUTTA MA' OFFICE!
Ah well. Back to the drawing board. Lets scrap that nice idea and replace it with something more ordinary. Lets say.......mini racers around a bedroom, or yet another 3rd/1s**t person shooter - that get this - involves tactical squad communication! WOW! Lets make the lead s**trong, tough and oh so camp, but oh so obviously heterosexual? (I mean 'Serious Sam' Hes a bit, well, camp eh?) Have him backed up with a bus**ty feis**ty s**tupidly attractive (supposedly) woman who can shoot a bad huy through the head and down the next with a crackin' one liner.
Yeah. That oughta do it.
------------
Thank God for Nintendo, Lionhead, Ion Storm and that select few.
Strafex wrote:
> So we're meant to think for ourself but we're forced to be gay???
>
> Ahem...
>
> You trying to change us all Cyclone? :-D
Of course Strafex! What else?
Perhpas you don't need to change eh?
;)
> So we're meant to think for ourself but we're forced to be gay???
>
> Ahem...
>
> You trying to change us all Cyclone? :-D
Of course Strafex! What else?
Perhpas you don't need to change eh?
;)
Nah, I'm just annoyed with getting EA-type crap forced down my throat the whole time....
So we're meant to think for ourself but we're forced to be gay???
Ahem...
You trying to change us all Cyclone? :-D
Ahem...
You trying to change us all Cyclone? :-D
What a brilliant post!
Yah. Odd title I know. But who cares? By the way - The 'game' (yes that is what it is) has a gay lead character, who openly admits it. He is also backed up by a woman who can actualy think for herself, is actualy quite unattractive and also does not wear glasses, even though shes intellignet -and she can even not-get-shot-in-an-odd-Half-Life kinda way.
What an odd game? Perhaps even odder is the fact that it dosen't bother with life, explosions, manipulation, or even try to deal with love or anything like that. It deals with one thing. I have no idea what - Thats for the player to decide. WHAT? The player to think - *shudders* For themselves? What in Gods name is this kind of game? A GAY! Lead character? Non-linearity? Is that possible?
Proably not, but I'm no developer. You decide. Ah! Can't. Ah well. Jus**t join EA and churn out yet another sub-s**tandard PS2 to GC port. Thanks. Thats usual. Normal. You expect £35 for that? Fine! I'll believe the advertising and take it. So what is its a sub-s**tandard game?! Back to the normal world where expectations are met. Easy.
Dooki Moonki Woonki? What kinda title is that? Its NOT a 3-d tactical squad based shooter? WELL WHY ARE YA WASTING MY TIME? We need Blake DuKillers SP OPS Tactical Assault Squad, not this imaginative sh*t.
GET OUTTA MA' OFFICE!
Ah well. Back to the drawing board. Lets scrap that nice idea and replace it with something more ordinary. Lets say.......mini racers around a bedroom, or yet another 3rd/1s**t person shooter - that get this - involves tactical squad communication! WOW! Lets make the lead s**trong, tough and oh so camp, but oh so obviously heterosexual? (I mean 'Serious Sam' Hes a bit, well, camp eh?) Have him backed up with a bus**ty feis**ty s**tupidly attractive (supposedly) woman who can shoot a bad huy through the head and down the next with a crackin' one liner.
Yeah. That oughta do it.
------------
Thank God for Nintendo, Lionhead, Ion Storm and that select few.
What an odd game? Perhaps even odder is the fact that it dosen't bother with life, explosions, manipulation, or even try to deal with love or anything like that. It deals with one thing. I have no idea what - Thats for the player to decide. WHAT? The player to think - *shudders* For themselves? What in Gods name is this kind of game? A GAY! Lead character? Non-linearity? Is that possible?
Proably not, but I'm no developer. You decide. Ah! Can't. Ah well. Jus**t join EA and churn out yet another sub-s**tandard PS2 to GC port. Thanks. Thats usual. Normal. You expect £35 for that? Fine! I'll believe the advertising and take it. So what is its a sub-s**tandard game?! Back to the normal world where expectations are met. Easy.
Dooki Moonki Woonki? What kinda title is that? Its NOT a 3-d tactical squad based shooter? WELL WHY ARE YA WASTING MY TIME? We need Blake DuKillers SP OPS Tactical Assault Squad, not this imaginative sh*t.
GET OUTTA MA' OFFICE!
Ah well. Back to the drawing board. Lets scrap that nice idea and replace it with something more ordinary. Lets say.......mini racers around a bedroom, or yet another 3rd/1s**t person shooter - that get this - involves tactical squad communication! WOW! Lets make the lead s**trong, tough and oh so camp, but oh so obviously heterosexual? (I mean 'Serious Sam' Hes a bit, well, camp eh?) Have him backed up with a bus**ty feis**ty s**tupidly attractive (supposedly) woman who can shoot a bad huy through the head and down the next with a crackin' one liner.
Yeah. That oughta do it.
------------
Thank God for Nintendo, Lionhead, Ion Storm and that select few.