The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Okay, I think most would agree that Summerslam was the best 'wrestling' event of the year by some way, even if some of the results sucked. From this, you would think that Raw and Smackdown would benefit from this. How wrong can someone be! Let's take a look at this week's results...
The World Title makes a comeback and the title is given to HHH. This is a blatent ego trip for HHH. HHH has recently annoyed me with sucky matches and boring interviews (with the exception of Shawn V HHH at Summerslam) and as he has some pull with the script writers, he gives himself a title and beats Ric Flair. Is there any point? Chances are he will face RVD at Unforgiven and HHH will win.
On Raw, there was rumours of a mystery jumper. I'm sick of all this jumping already. You would think it would be a high profile name and it turned out to be Crash! This really isn't what I wanted the roster split to be. The idea was perfectly sound but it's turned into a joke. Scrap it now! Another joke is that the WWF (I'm still not going to say WWE!) think that Raw has a better roster! Which show are they watching?
Here's something that will turn your stomach. Chuck PROPOSED to Billy and he accepted! WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ALL ABOUT? Can the WWF honestly say that the majority of the audience would want to see this?
Here I go again about Brock Lesnar not deserving the title again. The WWF had no idea what to do with him before he won the title. The WWF have no clue what to do with after he has won the title. He's had 2 matches since he won the title and who has he fought? Matt Hardy and Randy Orton! Wow! He can beat up lower carders! Let's all give him a round of applause. If they wanted Brock to be big, a slower build up would have been much better. Perhaps they would have made people care.
While I'm here, I might as well have a go at Mark Henry and Rikishi. I'm sick of seeing them wrestle. Mark Henry hasn't impressed me since returning and Rikishi hasn't given a good match for a while now. No one cares about Reverend D'Von and Bautista feuding. D'Von's gimmick got old very fast and Bautista is much better than that.
That's your lot for now.
The World Title makes a comeback and the title is given to HHH. This is a blatent ego trip for HHH. HHH has recently annoyed me with sucky matches and boring interviews (with the exception of Shawn V HHH at Summerslam) and as he has some pull with the script writers, he gives himself a title and beats Ric Flair. Is there any point? Chances are he will face RVD at Unforgiven and HHH will win.
On Raw, there was rumours of a mystery jumper. I'm sick of all this jumping already. You would think it would be a high profile name and it turned out to be Crash! This really isn't what I wanted the roster split to be. The idea was perfectly sound but it's turned into a joke. Scrap it now! Another joke is that the WWF (I'm still not going to say WWE!) think that Raw has a better roster! Which show are they watching?
Here's something that will turn your stomach. Chuck PROPOSED to Billy and he accepted! WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ALL ABOUT? Can the WWF honestly say that the majority of the audience would want to see this?
Here I go again about Brock Lesnar not deserving the title again. The WWF had no idea what to do with him before he won the title. The WWF have no clue what to do with after he has won the title. He's had 2 matches since he won the title and who has he fought? Matt Hardy and Randy Orton! Wow! He can beat up lower carders! Let's all give him a round of applause. If they wanted Brock to be big, a slower build up would have been much better. Perhaps they would have made people care.
While I'm here, I might as well have a go at Mark Henry and Rikishi. I'm sick of seeing them wrestle. Mark Henry hasn't impressed me since returning and Rikishi hasn't given a good match for a while now. No one cares about Reverend D'Von and Bautista feuding. D'Von's gimmick got old very fast and Bautista is much better than that.
That's your lot for now.
Page:
up_in_smoke wrote:
> Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get
> to see legs, arms and necks break.
Ooh...lovely. :S
Actually, good wrestling is more of an art form. Not just basic fighting.
> Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get
> to see legs, arms and necks break.
Ooh...lovely. :S
Actually, good wrestling is more of an art form. Not just basic fighting.
well.. yeah. Why else would anyone watch things like wrestling and UFC.
If it isnt for the violence, you might aswell go to the ballet if you just want to watch movements.
If it isnt for the violence, you might aswell go to the ballet if you just want to watch movements.
up_in_smoke wrote:
> Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get
> to see legs, arms and necks break.
And that's good is it?
> Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get
> to see legs, arms and necks break.
And that's good is it?
Well i dont like eastenders, i think its pretty bad too. The acting is bad and the story lines are bad.
You say that UFC is repetative?? Wrestlings the same thing each time ive ever seen it. Someone starts winning. Then some guy comes out the dressing room and distracts the ref. then when the ref is doing an inept job of getting rid of the guy at the side saying "hey ref, hey ref look at me!" the guy who was loosing hits the guy in the head with a chair, but also somehow gets hurt himself and then its a race to get up. the person who gets up first wins!
Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get to see legs, arms and necks break.
You say that UFC is repetative?? Wrestlings the same thing each time ive ever seen it. Someone starts winning. Then some guy comes out the dressing room and distracts the ref. then when the ref is doing an inept job of getting rid of the guy at the side saying "hey ref, hey ref look at me!" the guy who was loosing hits the guy in the head with a chair, but also somehow gets hurt himself and then its a race to get up. the person who gets up first wins!
Same everytime. Atleast with UFC it isnt planned and you actually get to see legs, arms and necks break.
up_in_smoke wrote:
> Does anyone actually give a crap about wrestling?
>
Look at how many people are in this forum. Now look at youself. It's one against a good 50 odd...now, you're going to lose, so don't waste your time!
> you do know its fake right????
Yup. You know Eastenders is fake, right?
>
> I dont get, if they want to hurt each other surely a good blow to the
> face with a nicely placed upper-cut would do far more than some of the
> crap they do there.. TRUE?? true.
You know your moves son...keep up the good work. True indeed, but it would be crap otherwise. Did you see Lisa blurt out that she shot Phil? Nope, they carried it out. Same with a WWE match...
>
>
> Now ultimate fighting championship is something btter than wrestling,
> why dont you discuss that.
UFC is good...but repetative.
>
> Just saying.
Just replying.
> Does anyone actually give a crap about wrestling?
>
Look at how many people are in this forum. Now look at youself. It's one against a good 50 odd...now, you're going to lose, so don't waste your time!
> you do know its fake right????
Yup. You know Eastenders is fake, right?
>
> I dont get, if they want to hurt each other surely a good blow to the
> face with a nicely placed upper-cut would do far more than some of the
> crap they do there.. TRUE?? true.
You know your moves son...keep up the good work. True indeed, but it would be crap otherwise. Did you see Lisa blurt out that she shot Phil? Nope, they carried it out. Same with a WWE match...
>
>
> Now ultimate fighting championship is something btter than wrestling,
> why dont you discuss that.
UFC is good...but repetative.
>
> Just saying.
Just replying.
Does anyone actually give a crap about wrestling?
you do know its fake right????
I dont get, if they want to hurt each other surely a good blow to the face with a nicely placed upper-cut would do far more than some of the crap they do there.. TRUE?? true.
Now ultimate fighting championship is something btter than wrestling, why dont you discuss that.
Just saying.
you do know its fake right????
I dont get, if they want to hurt each other surely a good blow to the face with a nicely placed upper-cut would do far more than some of the crap they do there.. TRUE?? true.
Now ultimate fighting championship is something btter than wrestling, why dont you discuss that.
Just saying.
Grandprix wrote:
> It would be better if the Island Boys actually had a match!
True, although there aren't many face tag teams for them to have a match with.
> It would be better if the Island Boys actually had a match!
True, although there aren't many face tag teams for them to have a match with.
It would be better if the Island Boys actually had a match!
One quick thing...apart from the main event and cruiserweight, I actually think RAW has the stronger roster. If Smackdown utilised their talent better then they would have, but most cruisers are just being wasted.
Like Matt, I'm sick of seeing people like Mark Henry, Rikishi and D-Von filling up most of the midcard with pointless squash matches. At least with RAW you've got Kane, the UnAmericans, Tommy Dreamer, Jeff Hardy and The Island Boys to keep us interested. Also, Eric Bischoff is a much more interesting character than Stephanie.
Like Matt, I'm sick of seeing people like Mark Henry, Rikishi and D-Von filling up most of the midcard with pointless squash matches. At least with RAW you've got Kane, the UnAmericans, Tommy Dreamer, Jeff Hardy and The Island Boys to keep us interested. Also, Eric Bischoff is a much more interesting character than Stephanie.
You know, they were planning to have Too Cool do the gay marriage angle...
Apparently, Vince has wanted to do it for a long time now.
Apparently, Vince has wanted to do it for a long time now.
Page: