The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Is it just me that thinks that the SSB series has endless oppertunnites. new characters, levels, unlockables, etc.
I disagree, you can't tell me those sequels weren't very good, because they were. They had an idea, and developed it. Nintendo are Nintendo, fresh, original and innovative.
NOT Sony.
NOT Sony.
I like the game but its not the game were new levels and characters will want me to buy a sequal.
They will have to really add some new ideas to make me buy it.
Also i see nintendo becoming more like sony every day.
And people will not like it but look at the PS1 and how well it did, maybe its a good idea to do so.
First the beer-gaming-party, then the sequal after sequal, and next the wor... money nintendo will get from selling the console.
They will have to really add some new ideas to make me buy it.
Also i see nintendo becoming more like sony every day.
And people will not like it but look at the PS1 and how well it did, maybe its a good idea to do so.
First the beer-gaming-party, then the sequal after sequal, and next the wor... money nintendo will get from selling the console.
It's not even coming out, because Nintendo won't make the same game twice. Which is what they'd be doing if they brought out a third Super Smash Bros. Melee.
And ~Resurection~, I can tell you've never played the game.
And ~Resurection~, I can tell you've never played the game.
bender1609 wrote:
> Is it just me that thinks that the SSB series has endless
> oppertunnites. new characters, levels, unlockables, etc.
face it mate it's gonna be just as lame as the first 2 and just as boring.
more nintendo orginality i guess hey :)
> Is it just me that thinks that the SSB series has endless
> oppertunnites. new characters, levels, unlockables, etc.
face it mate it's gonna be just as lame as the first 2 and just as boring.
more nintendo orginality i guess hey :)
I don't think that they are endless.
Melee has covered most of what can be done with the franchise.
Further possible improvements:
More characters playing at a time (I think 8 would be a nice maximum - good for team games and allows 4 human + 4 computer players at once).
If you think 8 players is crowded, you don't HAVE to have that many - just an option for those that do.
Internet link up - (again, for possible 8 player games) - also that would mean people like Edgy and Cookie who didn't get much multiplay to appreciate the first time round.
Improved one player modes:
Classic was how it should be.
Adventure needs to be better.
Zelda and Mario were alright, but the rest of the levels were unimaginative and generally sucked!
Also, having games like the original Mario games, Donkey Kong Country, Super Metroid etc, as unlockable secrets would give newer players an insight into their character's past.
Even then, would a Melee sequel be worth paying another 35 quid or so for this?
Melee has covered most of what can be done with the franchise.
Further possible improvements:
More characters playing at a time (I think 8 would be a nice maximum - good for team games and allows 4 human + 4 computer players at once).
If you think 8 players is crowded, you don't HAVE to have that many - just an option for those that do.
Internet link up - (again, for possible 8 player games) - also that would mean people like Edgy and Cookie who didn't get much multiplay to appreciate the first time round.
Improved one player modes:
Classic was how it should be.
Adventure needs to be better.
Zelda and Mario were alright, but the rest of the levels were unimaginative and generally sucked!
Also, having games like the original Mario games, Donkey Kong Country, Super Metroid etc, as unlockable secrets would give newer players an insight into their character's past.
Even then, would a Melee sequel be worth paying another 35 quid or so for this?