The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A robot.
Whilst shooting the non-violent remake of 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' Michael was demonstrating chainsaw swinging techniques to the actor playing 'Leatherface' when he accidently sliced through his own arm. The cast and crew stood in shock for several minutes when no claret came spewing forth from the gash, but smoke. A mess of wires could clearly been seen though.
e-Bay, as he shall now be known, whisked himself off for emergency repairs, whilst filming continued on the movie.
As shocking as this is, should we really be surprised? Looking back over past movies it's easy to see that he has been caught in a number of cyclic programming loops, causing repeated concepts in movies. For instance, in 'Bad Boys' you have Will Smith and Martin Lawrence as buddies, but as they've swapped roles there are some 'issues' between them.
'The Rock' sees Sean Connery team up with Nicholas Cage, and they don't get on too well.
'Armageddon' has Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck as heroes working together, but with problems between them.
And apparently 'Pearl Harbor' has two male leads displeased with each other over some bird.
In the last three of these movies, 'The Rock' 'Armageddon' and 'Pearl Harbor' the lead female character has been brunette and has had to sit out the finale from some kind of 'control' area with army men, or other officials.
Also, eBay's movies don't tend to build up the characters, and have major events occuring in visual stunning locations, or at sunsets, in storms or the like. This concentration on visuals rather than emotions is clearly the work of a robot, and not someone capable of human feeling.
Michael eBay's recent swing towards non-violence is clearly down to reprogramming. The only question that remains is who is it that is working this eBay robot? Someone must be responsible for his work, and his recent change of scope. The bookies say the smart money is on Wings Hauser, and who are we to argue?
> You always do this. You make up a story, and pass it off as real. I
> believe you, tell my friends, and they laugh at me.
:o)
But this one IS true!
You always do this. You make up a story, and pass it off as real. I believe you, tell my friends, and they laugh at me.
Don't forget the president's speeches, and that shot where the camera goes around them as they turn around themselves
Michael Bay rules though
Well now I don't know what to think...
A robot.
Whilst shooting the non-violent remake of 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' Michael was demonstrating chainsaw swinging techniques to the actor playing 'Leatherface' when he accidently sliced through his own arm. The cast and crew stood in shock for several minutes when no claret came spewing forth from the gash, but smoke. A mess of wires could clearly been seen though.
e-Bay, as he shall now be known, whisked himself off for emergency repairs, whilst filming continued on the movie.
As shocking as this is, should we really be surprised? Looking back over past movies it's easy to see that he has been caught in a number of cyclic programming loops, causing repeated concepts in movies. For instance, in 'Bad Boys' you have Will Smith and Martin Lawrence as buddies, but as they've swapped roles there are some 'issues' between them.
'The Rock' sees Sean Connery team up with Nicholas Cage, and they don't get on too well.
'Armageddon' has Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck as heroes working together, but with problems between them.
And apparently 'Pearl Harbor' has two male leads displeased with each other over some bird.
In the last three of these movies, 'The Rock' 'Armageddon' and 'Pearl Harbor' the lead female character has been brunette and has had to sit out the finale from some kind of 'control' area with army men, or other officials.
Also, eBay's movies don't tend to build up the characters, and have major events occuring in visual stunning locations, or at sunsets, in storms or the like. This concentration on visuals rather than emotions is clearly the work of a robot, and not someone capable of human feeling.
Michael eBay's recent swing towards non-violence is clearly down to reprogramming. The only question that remains is who is it that is working this eBay robot? Someone must be responsible for his work, and his recent change of scope. The bookies say the smart money is on Wings Hauser, and who are we to argue?