The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Why do some people always get so worked up about movie sequels?
I mean, honestly, it's not like sequels don't happen in real life, is it?
From 1914-1918 we had the First World War, then years later along comes the sequel, World War 2.
So if it's alright for real events, surely it's okay for movies too, right?
Discuss.
Or pick your nose.
I mean, honestly, it's not like sequels don't happen in real life, is it?
From 1914-1918 we had the First World War, then years later along comes the sequel, World War 2.
So if it's alright for real events, surely it's okay for movies too, right?
Discuss.
Or pick your nose.
LOL nice analogy Meka.
Sequels are fine if they arent sloppy rehashes, made to make more money.
Sequels are fine if they arent sloppy rehashes, made to make more money.
It tends to be even better if the sequel is better than the original...
Past examples include Mad Max and Death Wish.
Scary Movie's sequel was a disgrace to film making.
Past examples include Mad Max and Death Wish.
Scary Movie's sequel was a disgrace to film making.
There is nothing worse than a cheesy sequel.
*picks nose*
Why do some people always get so worked up about movie sequels?
I mean, honestly, it's not like sequels don't happen in real life, is it?
From 1914-1918 we had the First World War, then years later along comes the sequel, World War 2.
So if it's alright for real events, surely it's okay for movies too, right?
Discuss.
Or pick your nose.
I mean, honestly, it's not like sequels don't happen in real life, is it?
From 1914-1918 we had the First World War, then years later along comes the sequel, World War 2.
So if it's alright for real events, surely it's okay for movies too, right?
Discuss.
Or pick your nose.