The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You have to ask yourself for a game that was supposed to be technically to advanced for the Playstation2, Was that the real reason behind going for Xbox? I think not the truth is MS paid them a lot of money to become an exclusive title thinking they were going to rake in the money however the reality was very different not unlike the Xbox itself.
Core have been much more level headed and realised that the market share has to be a deciding factor and therefore took the wise financially sound option of developing exclusively for the PS2.
You have to ask yourself for a game that was supposed to be technically to advanced for the Playstation2, Was that the real reason behind going for Xbox? I think not the truth is MS paid them a lot of money to become an exclusive title thinking they were going to rake in the money however the reality was very different not unlike the Xbox itself.
Core have been much more level headed and realised that the market share has to be a deciding factor and therefore took the wise financially sound option of developing exclusively for the PS2.
The X-box is a from a new company in the console wars, and Nintendo used to be cartridge-based. In the future, I can see both of these companies using Sony's wise tactic.
As for the DreamCast. Well, that's been left in the dark. It was released far too early and, now, people have moved on.