The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
It's getting annoying now, it's glaringly obvious after their almost no show at E3 that they'll be going multi-format. I know they love making us wait for games but this is just taking the pish..
Page:
Bring back 'Captain N: The Game Master' and we'll never need Rare again!!
But it's very true that Rare did keep the N64 alive with the likes of Perfect Dark, Conker, GoldenEye, and more.
Nintendo may have become Sega - and given-up completely without them! :o
Imagine how much the other consoles will benfit from them... :(
But it's very true that Rare did keep the N64 alive with the likes of Perfect Dark, Conker, GoldenEye, and more.
Nintendo may have become Sega - and given-up completely without them! :o
Imagine how much the other consoles will benfit from them... :(
Goldeneye for a bit in Europe?
Goldeneye ruled the west!!
I reckon that atleast 60% of N64 owners originally bought it for Goldeneye.
People who already had an N64 enjoyed Zelda, but show it to a non-Nintendo fan and they'll call it kiddie.
Goldeneye turned Playstation owners green!!
Even they couldn't properly slate it!
Goldeneye ruled the west!!
I reckon that atleast 60% of N64 owners originally bought it for Goldeneye.
People who already had an N64 enjoyed Zelda, but show it to a non-Nintendo fan and they'll call it kiddie.
Goldeneye turned Playstation owners green!!
Even they couldn't properly slate it!
Monkey_With_Attitude wrote:
> Dringo wrote:
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them
> for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
>
>
> heh just try and say that you hate them Dringo...
>
> I may be wrong in saying this but just to bug you more and remind
> you...I think it was RARE that kept the N64 afloat.
in Europe... yeah with Goldeneye for a bit in the rest of the world that honor goes to Pokemon and Zelda.
As for RARE being crap... they are... aren't they *Dringo points at present Sony fans* remmember they aren't that good wink wink...
But honestly Nintendo need rare for Perfect Dark and Conker all there other genres are covered by the big N.
> Dringo wrote:
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them
> for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
>
>
> heh just try and say that you hate them Dringo...
>
> I may be wrong in saying this but just to bug you more and remind
> you...I think it was RARE that kept the N64 afloat.
in Europe... yeah with Goldeneye for a bit in the rest of the world that honor goes to Pokemon and Zelda.
As for RARE being crap... they are... aren't they *Dringo points at present Sony fans* remmember they aren't that good wink wink...
But honestly Nintendo need rare for Perfect Dark and Conker all there other genres are covered by the big N.
Dringo wrote:
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
how can such evil words be spoken?
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
how can such evil words be spoken?
Dringo wrote:
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
HOW DARE YOU! *slaps Dringo* :D
Jet Force Gemini was awesome, Bnanjo Kazooie was second only to Mario, Conker was plain hilarious! Rare remain easily one of my favourite developers, and in my opinion one of the best around...
*loses all respect for Dringo* ;-)
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
HOW DARE YOU! *slaps Dringo* :D
Jet Force Gemini was awesome, Bnanjo Kazooie was second only to Mario, Conker was plain hilarious! Rare remain easily one of my favourite developers, and in my opinion one of the best around...
*loses all respect for Dringo* ;-)
Solskjær wrote:
> That might be true, but when they go multi-format, we might find out
> that they can make one heck of an RTS or Beat-'em-Up on the PS2 or
> X-box!
The thing is, they are capable of doing it and so they will to make more money. if you could make more money easily wouldn't you take it? Plus a larger fan base.
Isn't that right Dringo...:-D
> That might be true, but when they go multi-format, we might find out
> that they can make one heck of an RTS or Beat-'em-Up on the PS2 or
> X-box!
The thing is, they are capable of doing it and so they will to make more money. if you could make more money easily wouldn't you take it? Plus a larger fan base.
Isn't that right Dringo...:-D
That might be true, but when they go multi-format, we might find out that they can make one heck of an RTS or Beat-'em-Up on the PS2 or X-box!
Dringo wrote:
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
heh just try and say that you hate them Dringo...
I may be wrong in saying this but just to bug you more and remind you...I think it was RARE that kept the N64 afloat.
> It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for
> the first person shooters... well and Conker.
heh just try and say that you hate them Dringo...
I may be wrong in saying this but just to bug you more and remind you...I think it was RARE that kept the N64 afloat.
It doesn't matter, Rare aren't that good anyway we only need them for the first person shooters... well and Conker.
I don't know whether Rare will go multi-platform. It is of course a possibility, and it may happen. But I doubt that Rare even think about it that much.
Page: