The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Amidst the romours that are hovering around I think it would be fair if we had a Re-Election where everybody gets to vote again.
and if the results are more or less the same as last time then fair enough!
and if the results are more or less the same as last time then fair enough!
Page:
Next election, Notables votes shouls only count as one, same as everyone else. Newbies can't vote.
1 person with the most votes is notable, simple as that.
IMHO.
1 person with the most votes is notable, simple as that.
IMHO.
Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I
> go through all that again. The next election will be in three months,
> and will go off without a hitch.
*Looks stunned*
What have they done to you Mr Snuggly
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I
> go through all that again. The next election will be in three months,
> and will go off without a hitch.
*Looks stunned*
What have they done to you Mr Snuggly
er-no - that is the most incredible method of inducing a spate of spamming I have ever come across.
Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I
> go through all that again. The next election will be in three months,
> and will go off without a hitch.
NEWBIES CAN'T VOTE. ONLY REGULARS WHO HAVE POSTED MORE THAN 2000 POSTS.
There we go... :-P
Don't listen to me.. :D
> Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
>
> Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I
> go through all that again. The next election will be in three months,
> and will go off without a hitch.
NEWBIES CAN'T VOTE. ONLY REGULARS WHO HAVE POSTED MORE THAN 2000 POSTS.
There we go... :-P
Don't listen to me.. :D
Doughnut Monster wrote:
> genesisofthesith wrote:
> what about having a re election to see what notables should remain
> notables.
>
> That's what I said!
My mistake I guess, I interpreted what you said as calling for a re-vote on the previous election as a way of validating the results.
> genesisofthesith wrote:
> what about having a re election to see what notables should remain
> notables.
>
> That's what I said!
My mistake I guess, I interpreted what you said as calling for a re-vote on the previous election as a way of validating the results.
By the way, Mr. Snuggly - thank you for allowing my vote to stand.
Sorry about any additional problems it caused, though I don't think it would have added to much to the bedlam. :-)
Sorry about any additional problems it caused, though I don't think it would have added to much to the bedlam. :-)
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I go through all that again. The next election will be in three months, and will go off without a hitch.
Please tell me you're joking. No, never in a trillion years would I go through all that again. The next election will be in three months, and will go off without a hitch.
genesisofthesith wrote:
> what about having a re election to see what notables should remain
> notables.
That's what I said!
> what about having a re election to see what notables should remain
> notables.
That's what I said!
I almost didnt get to vote this time because I hadnt heard the election date. I got on in time though.
Page: