The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
What happens if on the day of the notable vote after the voting has ended we end up with multiple people on the same number of votes tied for first place? Who would get the deciding vote?
I vote that under the circumstance of a draw SR pay for all the members who have the same number of votes to fight it out and the last person standing gets to be notable. They should also film it and give it a comical name and make it a free gift available to all members.
Ok how would you decide it if it was to end up a draw?
I vote that under the circumstance of a draw SR pay for all the members who have the same number of votes to fight it out and the last person standing gets to be notable. They should also film it and give it a comical name and make it a free gift available to all members.
Ok how would you decide it if it was to end up a draw?
Page:
Sgt Pepper wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Or it might have been 3.
>
> probibly jif/cif
---
Sshhhh. (Don't tell everyone)
;-)
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Or it might have been 3.
>
> probibly jif/cif
---
Sshhhh. (Don't tell everyone)
;-)
AfroJoe wrote:
> Or it might have been 3.
probibly jif/cif
> Or it might have been 3.
probibly jif/cif
heh, wish I had some of that stuff actually.
:D
:D
Hercules! wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Willy Wonkers Fizzy Lifting drinks?
LOL
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Willy Wonkers Fizzy Lifting drinks?
LOL
I think that it should be the next person with the most votes after the people tying will win.
AfroJoe wrote:
> I remember having 2 cans of... errr... this stuff.
>
> Not too sure what it was.
----------
Shandy?
Lemonade?
Willy Wonkers Fizzy Lifting drinks?
A can of liquidised wine gums?
> I remember having 2 cans of... errr... this stuff.
>
> Not too sure what it was.
----------
Shandy?
Lemonade?
Willy Wonkers Fizzy Lifting drinks?
A can of liquidised wine gums?
AfroJoe wrote:
> No·² wrote:
> why not the first person to win GAD again out of them is a notable?
>
> :D
>
> ---
>
> There'd still be a problem.
>
> What if 2, or even 3 of them all won on the same day.
>
> :-)
then they could do who posted first
:-)
> No·² wrote:
> why not the first person to win GAD again out of them is a notable?
>
> :D
>
> ---
>
> There'd still be a problem.
>
> What if 2, or even 3 of them all won on the same day.
>
> :-)
then they could do who posted first
:-)
No·² wrote:
> why not the first person to win GAD again out of them is a notable?
>
> :D
---
There'd still be a problem.
What if 2, or even 3 of them all won on the same day.
:-)
> why not the first person to win GAD again out of them is a notable?
>
> :D
---
There'd still be a problem.
What if 2, or even 3 of them all won on the same day.
:-)
why not the first person to win GAD again out of them is a notable?
:D
:D
Or it might have been 3.
Page: